Monday, January 12, 2026

4 Thoughts on The Golden Globes

1. The Host - I like Nikki Glaser, and I think she's a good host for awards shows. She's fairly safe, but has a little bit of a bite to her so that she's not boring. And as she said, her goal was to be a little silly and fun, and I think she succeeded. I thought her monologue was definitely better last year. I laughed out loud last year, but this year I was mildly amused. The only thing I found really funny is her taking a dig at Leo for dating young women, and then recognizing that that is such an unoriginal joke so she takes it further and explains that we don't know anything else about him! He rarely shares personal info, and I think he's one of those actors that has no interest in playing the fame game. So she brought up the interview that he did when he was 17 in which he said his favorite food is "pasta, pasta, and more pasta", and it was a good joke. She was able to turn an unoriginal dig at a movie star into something cute and funny. And then in the next sentence called Sean Penn a "sexy leather handbag". LOL. She did a good job at keeping things light for the rest of the show. I could have done without the KPop song she attempts because her voice is horrific, but then she also has Fran Drescher come out and tell her how grating her voice is - haha! Self-awareness and self-deprecation is also a key to hosting these things and Glaser definitely has both of those things down.  

2. The Show - Overall, I found the show a little dull. Mistakes were definitely made - as everyone on social media noted, the announcers were absolutely awful with the play-by-play of show. They had nothing interesting to say, and it felt unnecessary. They also didn't show clips of performances (always a mistake) and YET showed clips of the podcast nominees??? Make it make sense! Also, what the fuck is Polymarket? Forget it, I don't actually want to know. Some of the presenters were fantastic, though. Judd Apatow is HILARIOUS and maybe should take a stab at hosting an awards show??? And I loved Wanda Sykes accepting the award on Ricky Gervais' behalf and thanking "God and the trans community" (and I think Ricky would find that funny, too!). And then ending the show with Julia Roberts getting a standing ovation, followed by Don Cheadle digging George Clooney for not getting the same treatment (and his "knock 'em dead Batman" made me giggle). Also, GEORGE CLOONEY AND NOAH WYLE REUNION!!! You could tell George was just waiting for that hug and then Noah nodding at the camera like "yeah, I know that's what you guys wanted to see". SO GOOD! But the highlight, in my opinion, was the music! Who was the music supervisor because they are clearly a gay millennial and I was HERE FOR IT. Only a true genius plays "Return of the Mack" for a Macauley Culkin intro. 

3. The Winners - This is what really dragged the show down because it's all the expected winners, and that makes for a really boring show. The tv side was more egregious because they literally just followed the Emmy awards choices (with some minor differences because of category differences - the supporting category performance is for drama, comedy & miniseries, while the Emmys separates them). So, it's The Pitt, The Studio, Hacks, Adolescence etc. I do appreciate Seth Rogen actually thanking the crew members BY NAME, and Jean Smart calling herself "a greedy bitch". But the only shock was Rhea Seehorn, but it's even more shocking that she never won for Better Call Saul!! And for the film side, it's pretty clear that One Battle After Another is going to sweep the Oscars. I absolutely think it's category fraud for this to be in the comedy category. It would be nice for an actual comedy to win this award one day. I think Hamnet would be the upset if OBAA doesn't win. I haven't seen it, and I really, really, really don't want to (I read the book. It's good! But I feel like a movie version is going to be even more depressing). I also haven't seen If I Had Legs I'd Kick You, but I'm so obsessed with Rose Byrne (probably since Damages), so I'm so happy that she is finally getting recognition. I get the feeling that this movie is not a comedy either (??), but she is usually in comedy roles (and excels at them), so I'll allow it. I'm really not a Timmy fan, but I'll admit that his eagerness is endearing. I don't think he should be winning awards, and if he wins an Oscar over Leo I will throw things (or Wagner Moura - who I think is the front-runner. I haven't seen The Secret Agent, but Moura was fantastic as Pablo Escobar in Narcos, so I'm rooting for him too!). 

4. The Fashion - Once again, why is everyone so fucking boring nowadays? Where are the jaw-droppers? Where's Kristen Stewart wearing shorts? COME ON PEOPLE! My favorite dresses are the brightly colored ones - Wunmi Mosaku in that bright yellow??? Stunning (and I love the baby bump reveal! She's so cute!). Rose Byrne in that Atonement homage with the emerald green dress (it was too close to not be a homage). STUNNING (but I wish it fit a little better). I think Rhea Seehorn looked great in a literal golden globe dress. I don't like the dress, but I appreciate that Jennifer Lawrence showed us a different look for her because so many stars showed up in very expected dresses. I love that Mia Goth and Jenna Ortega are representing the goths, but I've seen both of those dresses before. Same for the Fanning sisters (the dresses, obvi. They are like the opposite of goth). And, once again, I hate the bridal looks (Brittany Snow, Amanda Seyfried, Claire Danes). But my least favorite dress was the one that JLo wore - the color, the poofy bottom, it's UGLY. 

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Thoughts on 5 Films

1. Train Dreams -
Ummmmm....this is so boring. I don't understand all of the praise, other than the fact that it looks really pretty and Joel Edgerton is good (not award level good, but he's...good). And the thing is, I *knew* it was going to be boring before I even started it. I feel like if you enjoy(?) Terrence Malick movies and/or Nomadland, then you will enjoy(?) this. It's visually quite beautiful, but I find it dull and offers nothing new story-telling wise. His life passes before his eyes and then he finally realizes its meaning/importance and then...it ends. That's it. I think the only part that felt a little different, for me, is the score that is very haunting along with his visions of people he interacted with that have died. That part is really effective, and it feels raw and unexplainable (on a relatable personal note, I had a teacher die in front of me when I was 17 and I still see his eyes rolling towards the back of his head as he convulsed. I think about it all the time. And it wasn't even a teacher I knew. But things like that effect your entire life and also how you live your life. I don't know why. Like I said, unexplainable). I also like the way it shows the way the world changes so drastically from the early 1900s to the 1960s. I love the supporting cast of Kerry Condon, Felicity Jones, and Clifton Collins Jr., but I wish they were given more to do. Overall, I was just disappointed that it was *just* as dull and boring as I expected it to be. 

2. Good Fortune -
This is cute. I like that it gives a little twist with the story of him living life as another person - basically an angel tries to teach this guy a lesson - the lesson being "money doesn't buy happiness: - by switching his life with a millionaire, and the dude is like "this is great! I'm so happy now!", so the whole thing backfires. It's a funny concept because it's true! Sure, money *doesn't* necessarily "buy" happiness, but it makes your life SO much easier so that you can deal with life better (the ups and the downs). You'll still deal with loss, heartbreak, stress, etc., but you'll also have a pool to relax in! Healthy and delicious food to eat! The ability to travel anywhere to distract your mind! Money makes life easier and I think, in turn, you will be happier (the caveat to this is to stay away from drugs - that shit will ruin you). I think this film does a good job of balancing these ideas and ultimately ends with "having enough" will make you happy. And I think that's true and more of a reasonable, achievable goal that people should have. I'm a big fan of Keanu Reeves, as a person (I actually have a Keanu story that I don't think I've ever told on here. Maybe one day), and even sometimes as an actor (Speed is one of my favorite movies of all time), but the honest truth is that he's a TERRIBLE actor. We just don't talk about it because he's in some BIG money-making films, and he's a good person, so we let him be and I'm not mad at it. But it becomes a problem in movies like this that rely on character development and being able to make cheesy dialogue work and he's downright awful in this. But I love Aziz Ansari, Keke Palmer, and Seth Rogen. I actually feel really bad for Aziz - he was canceled for a bad date and that is really shitty. I'm hoping people have forgotten (eventually people do forgive and forget - look at Robert Downey Jr.!), and he's back to making comedic projects. I loved Master of None, and I enjoyed this too (he wrote & directed it). Also, ONCE AGAIN, Sherry Cola is in this and underutilized!!! It keeps happening. She is SO hilarious - when is someone going to give her a starring role in something (I'll even take a costarring role at this point. Enough with the glorified cameos!). There's a few really funny moments in this too (the There Will Be Buns name for a cafe made me laugh out loud). The whole switching bodies trope is way over done in the film industry, but I think this was a fun watch. 

3. Bugonia - *spoilers ahead* 
I loved this! It's not my favorite Lanthimos - that would still be The Lobster (my unofficial ranking: The Lobster > Kinds of Kindness > Bugonia > Killing of a Sacred Deer > Poor Things > The Favourite. I just realized I've never seen any of his pre- The Lobster films and I probably should??). I think Emma Stone and Jesse Plemons could star in Lanthimos films for the rest of their careers and they would kill it every time. Oscar nominations all around. I really liked how this shows the radicalization of young men into conspiracy theorists - and how fucking crazy it is, but in true Lanthimos fashion, I knew it had to get weird at some point, so I guessed that she was, in fact, an alien. The reveal is really good though - and I did question myself many times. Is she? Isn't she? She does a great job of keeping her human instincts and I truly thought when she admits that she was an alien that she was still just playing him in order to escape (which is true, but then it turns out that SHE IS AN ALIEN!). It's also a lot funnier than I was expecting (I laughed when he started playing Green Day's "Basket Case". Perfect song choice!). And I loved the wild ending - it really goes THERE. Life will find a way! On a side note - only Emma Stone can pull off that shaved head look. I don't want to say anything else - like most Lanthimos films, you just have to experience it for yourself and immerse yourself in his crazy worlds. 

4. Eden -
This is nowhere near as bad as I was expecting it to be. I actually liked it. It definitely could have been better, but it's a solid 3 star film. I just figured with a cast like this - Jude Law, Sydney Sweeney, Ana de Armas, and Vanessa Kirby (four of the most beautiful people on the planet! And all good actors/actresses!), directed by Ron Howard would be a BIG movie. But I don't feel like "BIG" movies exist anymore outside of franchises (and that sucks, but I'm part of the problem. I went to the theater a total of ONE time last year. It just seems pointless now. I can just watch the movie at home a few months later at no extra charge and not have to deal with the annoying-as-fuck public). But I still thought that this was be an awards contender, so the fact that I never heard anyone even mention it, seemed like a really bad sign for this movie. And while I did enjoy it, I do get why it's not really well-received. The German accents are...rough (there's a LB review that says "Not gonna say who, but there are 5 people in this movie doing their take on a German accent and it is not German nor an accent" LOL). It's also not particularly beautiful either, which is shocking considering it takes place in the Galapagos Islands. It's all very drab and colorless. But I like the story (based on a true story of a small group of people who moved to this island and decided to make it their home), and this is Ana's movie - she's such a star, and she's also unexpectedly hilarious in this ("we're having a baby!!") with her over-the-top baroness who wants to open a hotel for wealthy people on the island. The film reminds me of Triangle of Sadness (and yes, I know nobody liked that either, but I did!), with its focus on greed and jealousy destroying things. I feel like there's a lot of filler - it could have easily been 30 minutes shorter and more to the point. I also like that it's also obviously a biblical tale, but it's not overtly about religion. I was shocked at the end with the reveal that the one woman lived on this island until her death at 96 and her descendants still live there! That's WILD! 

5. Ballerina -
I did an accidental Ana de Armas double-bill, and I am not complaining. I love her so much. But, I have to share just how bad my memory is, because I was convinced that this character was already introduced in the John Wick universe, but my husband didn't remember it that way (and he has a far better memory than I do). I said "yeah, remember she helps him at one point, maybe in the second one. She wears this black low-cut dress and kicks ass.". He seemed confused so I looked it up and NOPE she's not in them. LOL. I was thinking of Bond obviously, but I was CONVINCED I was right! Anyway, this revelation really confused me because why is there a "spin-off" for a character we've never met??? What's the point of that? There really is no point - it's a cash grab. And not a bad one. It's actually pretty entertaining and there are some terrifically choreographed fight sequences. And Keanu shows up for a large part of it (slightly more than a cameo)! And other John Wick characters! I probably enjoyed it more than some of the John Wick sequels, but who knows because my memory is terrible! But I definitely enjoyed it more than the John Wick spin-off (prequel) series because that was trash. I think Armas definitely holds her own in in action films and is believable in these roles even though she is super tiny, and only a few women can actually pull that off. 


Thursday, January 8, 2026

20 Books I Read in 2025

1. The Children Act, Ian McEwan - I really liked McEwan's Atonement (and I liked the movie too - but the first half is a thousand times better than the second half. The second half is trash!). I really liked this too, up until the weird obsessive relationship that forms. I was really struck by the "childless" talks - I think it's rare to show that a high-powered woman regrets not having children, but I find that to be true for a lot of women and NOBODY wants to talk about it. I know so many women who regret not having children and now they are too old. Your biological clock is a REAL thing! And I'm saying this as someone who never really wanted children and definitely don't now (I have no regrets - I'm 44 and already exhausted. I can't imagine having to keep someone else alive.). I just appreciate that this opens up some pretty tough dialogue in terms of women's issues (I know some will see it as sexist - especially because it's written by a man, but to them I say nonsense!). 

2. The Rum Diary, Hunter S. Thompson - I remember really liking this movie (although it starred Johnny Depp and Amber Heard and we all know how that turned out...). I was excited to read this - but definitely disappointed. It's...okay? I feel like more stuff happens in the movie? Maybe? I just feel like this manic energy played out more in the movie. Instead, this feels dull and pointless. I do dream of one day just moving to another country and living on the beach. I could totally do it, but then I remember that I have cats and I could never leave them. Oh yeah, and I'm married now and a homeowner. UGH. 

3. The Woman in Me, Britney Spears (Audiobook) - This is honestly one of the worst things I've ever read (or, more accurately, listened to). It's so badly written - it's actually incredible that this was published the way it is. And Michelle Williams as the narrator? AWFUL. The whole "fo' shiz" part went viral, but it's ALL like that. But let me rewind - I would like to proudly state that I am a huge Britney Spears fan. I've seen her in person three times (once at the Rockefeller Tree Lighting when she performed, once at Jive Records, in which I interned, getting on an elevator, and once in Hollywood when she was shopping and paparazzi literally trampled me to get pictures of her while she crossed the street. And this is a memory I will ALWAYS hold dear about her - because she STOPPED to make sure I was ok. I didn't interact with her but I watched her stop, point me out to her security in a concerned way, and her security came over to check on me. They told her I was okay and she did a little smile and wave. It's just basic human decency, but I think it's more and more rare to find in famous people). I think she's a sweetheart, a damn hard worker, and a terrific pop icon. But her family is trash. The way they used and abused her is disgusting. And if they really thought she was mentally ill why would they keep pushing her to perform??? HUH?! But on the flip-side, I do think Britney needed help (she just got the wrong kind of help), especially after her break up with Justin. I never knew how much that break up consumed her and I think it's really sad that she didn't have anyone to lean on. There's a quote about child stars - about how they never mature past the age they became famous at - and I think that's a big part of what happened to Britney. She's basically a 44 year old child. But two things can be true at the same time - she needed help and possibly a conservatorship AND her dad stole her money and basically imprisoned her. This autobiography made me realize *just* how immature she is and she takes ZERO accountability over her life - she still blames her childhood on a lot of her problems, because she grew up poor and her dad drank a lot (that's like 60% of American childhoods). She talks about her "drug problem" in a very flippant way and calls it "legal" multiple times because they were "legal energy pills" that she became addicted to. She says the word "legal" about 30 times to really emphasize her point - but abusing a "legal" substance is still drug abuse, Britney! COME ON. MAN UP. YOU HAVE CHILDREN FOR FUCK SAKE. That's basically what I screamed while I listened to this on my way to work in the mornings. 

4. The Reader, Bernhard Schlink - I did not like the movie version of this (although I didn't remember much about it - just Kate Winslet taking baths with a teenage boy), but I saw this at my library sale so I grabbed it, obviously hoping that the book is way better. But it's not. As I was reading this, I suddenly remembered the "twist" of her not being able to read. It's so fucking stupid that my brain hurts. It's also gross. And they try to humanize a nazi. Super gross. 

5. How the Scots Invented the Modern World, Arthur Herman - This actually slowed down my whole reading process for the year because I was getting so ahead of my year and then I took so long to read this. I always have a goal of reading at least 25 books and I rarely hit that (I'm always fascinated by the people who read like a 100 books a year??? How are you absorbing things??? It's the same people who watch 1000 movies a year - I watch like 250 average and I feel like that's still too much.). Anyway, I just couldn't get through this. I thought it would be more interesting and more about "inventions" that came from Scotland. But it's more of a history lesson (and a lot of it is religious history - which is so super boring to me...). But I did get a few things out of it - the NJ & Princeton connection is interesting, as is the way the Scots split during the American Revolution. I also was super interested in the part with Dr. Livingston using quinine because I've read a lot about quinine helping leg pain but it's no longer allowed (in the U.S at least) because a small percent of people had side effects. I would honestly risk it if given the option - the leg pain is unbearable sometimes! I do drink a ton of tonic water now (it still has a small dose of quinine), but I haven't noticed a difference. Anyway, I did learn a lot but I was also just bored - it took me like a week to get through like 30 pages! 

6. Audrey Hepburn in Paris, Meghan Friedlander - I didn't realize that I should have read Audrey at Home, first (I have that one too, but I've only skimmed it for recipes). That one is written by her son, and this one is a continuation of her life (her son was involved with this one, but it was written by Friedlander). It's also weird that I have another book titled Audrey in Paris (minus the "Hepburn"). I actually thought I bought the same book just with different covers, but nope - completely different. I guess I shouldn't be surprised - Audrey is endlessly fascinating. Such a talented woman, who knew exactly who she wanted to be - she had a say in every aspect of her career - her look, her projects, etc., she was always involved. I like the part in this that talks about Edith Head being the technical costumer for Sabrina, but it was really Audrey who found all of the inspiration and did most of the shopping. I wonder how many other projects Head took credit for? She's such an iconic costumer, it's interesting to see the behind-the-scenes of things. I actually might seek out a biography on her, because I would probably find it fascinating. Anyway, I enjoyed this, but I also love reading all things Audrey. It's the same as reading about Hitch. I could read 10 different books about him and find interesting things in all of them. 

7. The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo, Taylor Jenkins Reid - Okay, so I kind of read this by accident. I definitely bought it by accident. I thought it looked interesting - clearly inspired by Elizabeth Taylor, and I heard that they were making a miniseries out of it (or maybe a movie?) so I bought it. Then I realized it's the same author as Daisy Jones and The Six and I seriously hated that book - it's so...trite? I guess that's the word I'm looking for? Just so unoriginal, and poorly written (and that miniseries is not much better). So I stuck it on my bookshelf and said "no way am I reading this". And then, I forgot and pulled it off my shelf and was like "oh this looks good!" *face palm* I hated it. It's just so predictable and, once again, unoriginal. And I think Reid is a terrible writer. But people seem to enjoy her, so what do I know? 

8. Sula, Toni Morrison - I liked a lot about this - told through the perspective of two young black women in a world after slavery. It's layered, detailed, and has a sense of epic storytelling. But I also found myself confused way too often. Maybe I just wasn't in the right headspace, but I felt like I needed someone explaining things to me that I just read (like if I had read this in a classroom setting, I would have appreciated it more. That's not necessarily a bad thing - Midnight's Children is my favorite book of all time and I read that in a classroom setting. And the reason it's my favorite book is because my professor could give context to every sentence.). 

9. Misery, Stephen King - I think the best part of rereading this novel is realizing *just* how good Kathy Bates is in the role of Annie Wilkes. She really gives this character life and depth. But otherwise, this isn't as good of a book as I remember. It's extremely repetitive and kind of...simple? And I actually hate the chapters that are chapters from the book he is writing...it seems like a terrible book and I don't want to read it. LOL. But overall, I love this story. And King has a flair for suspense and character development that keep the reader engaged. 

10. 1968: The Year that Rocked the World, Mark Kurlansky - Wow. I highly recommend reading this if you are reading the news and feeling nothing but despair. Because 1968 is a LOT like 2024/2025. And in a way, that's disturbing - that's 57 years ago, we should have progressed much further than we have. But in another way, it's incredibly hopeful because we survived 1968. We'll survive this too! At least, that's what I got out of it. We're still here! The world didn't end! The same things were happening in 1968 - college protests, police brutality, Zionism - it's all there. It felt like I was just reading TODAY'S news. I like how thorough this book is, and how it connects the whole world together. It is far more interesting to read history through the eyes of one year, then to read history by nation. I feel like I learned more and connected the "whole picture". My husband always comments about how interesting it is to think about what other countries were doing while we were in the Civil War, or whatever, and I never really connected *just* how interesting that is. I kind of wish I could read more history like this. But 1968 is picked specifically for a lot of reasons - there were major assassinations, the Vietnam War, protests in Mexico, global political upheaval, AND we orbited the moon! I actually love that the book ends with the shot of Earth from the moon. Once again, it feels hopeful. My husband also says all the time that the key to peace is space travel. We'll see! 

11. The Year of Magical Thinking, Joan Didion - This is probably my favorite book that I read this year (maybe a tie between this and The Martian). I've never read anything by Joan Didion, and this caught my eye. I've obviously heard of her as more of a journalist, and her iconic fashion sense (she basically made scarves glamorous). But I knew very little about her. So I started reading this not knowing that both her husband and daughter died within a few years of each other. This book is a self-reflection of her grief from her husband suddenly dying and her daughter being extremely ill, and it's just a wonderful read. Possibly the most honest, personal story I've ever read that deals with grief like this. I'm now Didion obsessed (I actually bought myself her entire book collection for Christmas - so I'm in for a treat, I think!). 

12. Mindhunter: Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit, John E. Douglas & Mark Olshaker - I was a big fan of the Netflix Mindhunter series, so I was really happy to see this at my local library sale (you get to FILL a tote bag of books for only $7!! I usually get like 13-15 books per visit! For only $7!!!). So, this is based on Douglas' career as a criminal profiler and it's super interesting as to how accurate he became at this profession. It's essential to learn about why people become murderers, rapists, etc., in order to catch other criminals, but also to possibly prevent this from happening. I mean, you can't charge someone with a crime before they commit them, but you can recognize the signs of someone who might become violent and try to help them. It's really interesting to learn about this whole process, but it's also a *tough* read because all of this violent crime is true and they don't hold back on a lot of the gory details as just *facts of the case*. It definitely takes an emotional toll, so be prepared for that. 

13. Run Towards the Danger, Sarah Polley - I loved this! And I love Sarah Polley! She's lived a super interesting life as a child actor, but also has suffered childhood trauma - her mom died when she was young, her dad wasn't a typical "father figure", and she was exploited by the entertainment industry. I actually never thought of Polley as a child actor, because I've never heard of the show she was on, but it was super popular in Canada. I do remember reading about her experience working with Terry Gilliam (I think it circulated as part of "me too"), and it's horrific. It's WILD that we still let this man make movies! Polley has so much to say about the industry and her concern for child actors seems really genuine. And then she talks about how she suffered a traumatic brain injury as an adult that I had NO IDEA about. It's so scary to read about how nobody listened to her, and how she was treated as if she were exaggerating her injury, and how a lot of people gave up on her. I'm so happy that she's healthy now and able to tell her story. She's such a great writer, and an honest storyteller. My favorite documentary is Stories We Tell, because I think Polley absolutely nails the problems with telling the "truth" as "fact". Someone may be telling their truth, but it might not be factually accurate, and I find that so fascinating. Anyway, I loved reading this and I can't wait to see what she does next (sidenote - I wasn't a big fan of Women Talking, unfortunately). I will also point out that it might benefit you to read Through the Looking Glass before this, because it's referenced A LOT (and I've never read it...). 

14. Paris: The Memoir (extended edition), Paris Hilton - If you don't already know this about me, then here's the deal: I LOVE PARIS HILTON. One of the only reality tv shows I've ever watched is The Simple Life and it is fucking iconic. No exaggeration. I became a fan of Paris, but mostly Nicole Ritchie during that series. But Paris really grew on me - I've watched all of her shows, I think most recently Paris in Love, but also Cooking with Paris, and her documentary. I'm fascinated at how hard this woman works considering she can sit back and do nothing and still be a multi-millionaire. She's an heiress to the Hilton fortune for God's sake! Take a nap, Paris! But no...this bitch WORKS. And I fucking love it. I also love that she's found love and now has a family - she deserves happiness. And I highly recommend any doubters to read this memoir, or just read up on the abuse she endured during her time at Provo and how she has become a driving force in making these "troubled teen" schools illegal. It's insane how these "schools" emotionally, physically, and sexually abuse teenagers and not only GOT AWAY with it, but were PAID TO DO IT. I also think it's interesting that she's adapted the "baby voice" as an abuse survivor (literally every woman I know who does this voice has admitted abuse to me - the psychology behind it is fascinating). Is Paris a good writer? Nope, not at all. However, I actually loved reading this because she writes in a very stream-of-consciousness way, which is how I like to write (just literally whatever pops into my mind and I don't even edit. I read it once for, like, spelling errors, which I still miss a lot of, and then hit the orange publish button. Done and done). I think it just feels very genuine, like this is really her writing and reflecting on her life. And I love her.  

15. Zero Days, Ruth Ware - I read In a Dark, Dark Wood a few years back (I think I wrote about it on here, and I *think* I liked it? I don't remember). This was a fine read for a long plane ride, but in another setting, I probably would have hated it. It's like an episode of Alias, minus the character development. The main character is annoying and needy (even though she's supposed to be a bad-ass, it never comes off that way). It's just a very simple, predictable thriller. There's not much else to say. 

16. The Martian, Andy Weir - I LOVED THIS. I was a big fan of the movie, but the book might take the cake for me. It's the very definition of a "page turner". I could not stop reading it - and that is rare for me (reading makes me tired). I read the whole thing over the span of two days (on the deck of an over-the-water bure in Fiji. I live a tough life...) and I definitely want to watch the movie again to see the adaptation process. Because it doesn't seem like a book that would work visually, but they made it work! I love reading Mark Watney's thoughts on how he's going to survive. I feel like the movie focuses a bit more on the rest of the team than the book does, which makes sense because there's only so much of Watney growing potatoes that an audience can watch, but reading it and his thoughts - is SO interesting. It's amazing that some people have these survival skills, and not just the skill, but the WILL to survive. I just wouldn't. I would curl up in a ball and die. 

17. Didion and Babitz, Lili Anolik - So, I read this to learn more about Joan Didion, but unfortunately it's clear that the author HATES her, but has a fascination with Eve Babitz. And apparently Babitz and Didion go hand-in-hand when it comes to their history. I get the authors reasoning - they became more of a love/hate "frenemy" relationship, and Anolik chose the side she was already on (just like I chose Didion's). She wanted to find a new perspective in Babitz story - and this is how she decided to write it. But, I found it a little rude, to be honest. It did change my perspective a little too, though. Because it's clear that Anolik finds Didion writing about her dead husband as distasteful and a money grab, I immediately started researching a bit more and did not like what I found. As much as I loved The Year of Magical Thinking, it loses something if it, is in fact, dishonest. And the more I read about Didion's marriage, the more I do think it's dishonest. There are SO many accounts of John Dunne not only being abusive, but also possibly gay. And her daughter died of alcoholism not complications from the flu. So, why not tell the truth? I still find Didion's words to be super reflective of heartbreak and shock, and writer's WRITE. I think she decided to write the story as a way of healing and she wrote it SO FUCKING WELL that it became a massive hit. I don't think she purposely set out to exploit her own trauma. ANYWAY, I do think this book is written very well, and very thoroughly researched. I love the way she ends each decade with a famous Hollywood murder (Sharon Tate ends the 70s, Dominique Dunne ends the 80s. Also - this is how I learned that Griffen Dunne is Joan Didion's nephew). Also, if you love Eve Babitz, definitely read this. She's a hoot. 

18. Hello Beautiful, Ann Napolitano - I liked this book a lot, and it's obviously inspired by/a modern retelling of Little Women, which is a good idea. But they shouldn't have referenced Little Women - it actually made me feel angry. Does she think her readers were too stupid to see what she was doing? Like they wouldn't understand it unless she made it explicit? It's insulting! But anyway, I liked everything else about it - and I think it will stay with me. It's a story of family, loyalty, forgiveness, trauma, and loss, and it handles each subject with love and care. I love all of the characters - even the ones who mess up and hurt their loved ones. They all feel really genuine and human. It's all very "oh that's fucked up!", but also humans are going to human. And we're not perfect. 

19. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, Agatha Christie - Okay, so I guessed who the killer was within the first 30 pages and I don't think I was supposed to. I get that it was probably a "shocking" twist at the time, but I feel like that's been overdone to death now so it's sort of the expected route. I'm not going to spoil it for you, but I feel like this doesn't even try to hide where the story is going. So, all of the twists felt pointless. And the thing is - I knew who the "killer(s)" was in Murder on the Orient Express, and I still enjoyed reading that because I loved reading about how it all comes together, and how Poirot figures it out, but this was just a bore to get through. And the reveal of said murderer is so unremarkable. Overall, a dud. 

20. The Old Man and the Sea, Ernest Hemingway - UMMMM....I hated this. HAHA! I know it's a classic and whatever, but I couldn't give a flying fuck about fishing as a metaphor. Fuck off. I will be taking no further questions at this time. 

Friday, January 2, 2026

Thoughts on 5 Films

1. Roofman -
I wasn't really looking forward to this but then I saw that Derek Cianfrance directed it and WHAT??!! I'm instantly interested. My husband actually remembers this crazy story, but I definitely don't. It's the real-life story of a man who was hiding from the law after escaping prison, so he hid in a Toys-R-Us for months. I like the way this story is told from his perspective - showing his humanity and vulnerability instead of painting him as just a criminal. It makes sense that Cianfrance would take this story on - it is a tragic love story in the end. He becomes involved with one of the employees and becomes an important person in her life and her two teenage daughters, and obviously, there is no way for that to end well. Channing Tatum is a great casting choice for this - he doesn't take himself too seriously, has great comedic timing, and creates a truly loveable character here. I appreciate him in more comedic roles, but he does a great job with the serious parts in this too. He has great chemistry with Kirsten Dunst. And there's a great supporting cast too - Peter Dinklage, Juno Temple, Uzo Aduba, Ben Mendelsohn AND Melonie Diaz (how she didn't become a much bigger star after A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints is beyond me. She's such a good actress!). I just think this is a cute movie that has some memorable moments and it's an interesting true story. 

2. F1 -
I'm sorry, but it's HILARIOUS that this movie, about F1, stars a 62 year old man. I actually looked it up out of curiosity and the oldest F1 driver is 43 - that's still a 20 year difference. But most are mid 20s - early 30s and there's a REASON for that. They try to show Brad Pitt "training" for this challenge (he's the first one up! Running!), but you can't train for aging - and a natural part of aging is that your motor skills and reaction times start to slow down. And that's really the only important thing you need to have in order to drive a car - you need to fit in the car and be able to react quickly. I'm not saying he might not still be able to race cars! But as a part of a billion dollar sport? No. My mom's husband (about the same age as Pitt) still plays hockey! And soccer! But they are for over 40 leagues because that makes sense! It's just so stupid. Aside from the stupidity, I actually enjoyed this more than I thought I would. I think Joseph Kosinski is really making a name for himself in directing big budget action movies that focus on character development & storytelling while also getting those big spectacle moments. I rarely say this about a film with a runtime of 2 1/2 hours, but this zips by. It had my attention from beginning to end and aside from the actual racing it doesn't feel like there's any filler. And as someone who thinks racing cars is a dumb sport, the car racing is intense and interesting. The rules for F1 make absolutely no sense (and they even admit that in the movie), but it makes for a fun experience (I mean, I would never watch an actual F1 race, but I get why people do after watching this). I do feel like this movie is basically Ted Lasso but for car racing (he's harassed by a reporter, he has to "think outside the box" to win, he's an American in Europe etc.), but it works. I don't want to oversell it - it's a 3 star movie, but I was expecting to hate it. And as much as I DON'T WANT TO LIKE BRAD PITT ANYMORE (I believe Jolie 100%), he's such a fucking superstar it's hard to hate him. A true movie star. It's so fucking annoying. Damson Idris is set to be a star, as well. They have great chemistry together in this love/hate partnership. And Kerry Condon as the love interest is excellent - and I love that her role is a lot bigger than *just* the love interest. Overall, I was entertained. Although if it were 40 minutes shorter, I might have LOVED it. 

3. Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Story -
This is one of the most fucking boring movies I've seen all year. And I was not expecting that. I like this cast a lot - Josh O'Connor, Jeremy Renner, Cailee Spaeny, Andrew Scott, Daryl McCormack (hot!), Josh Brolin, Jeffrey Wright, Kerry Washington, Glenn Close, etc.,  - and I liked the first two movies (maybe not as much as others, though, I rated them both 3.5 stars). But this gives absolutely no point in hiring all these actors and then giving them nothing to do. This is O'Connor's film, and maybe one strong scene from Close. But otherwise, I couldn't even tell you who the rest of them are or why they are in this movie. There's also...no....mystery? It's clear how it's all going to play out and I never once questioned myself. And this has a completely different vibe than the first two - it's extremely serious and all the religious stuff just draaaagggss. It's so boring and mind-numbing. I don't understand Rian's thought process on making this one without considering that making the first two "fun" is the whole reason people wanted to see more of these films. He's done something that hasn't been done in a long time - created a detective character that you can build an entire franchise on (there's not many - Sherlock, Lupin, Poroit...that's it? I guess you can argue Bond? He's a detective of sorts - but none of those are recent characters). And yet, this is the story he wants to tell for the third movie? It doesn't make sense. I couldn't even make it through the whole thing in one sitting. I stopped it with 20 minutes left to go and then it took me days to force myself to finish those last 20 minutes. Jeffrey Wright's line delivery of "little punk bitch" is the best part of the whole movie. 

4. One Battle After Another -
I can't say that I loved this. I wanted to, but I just don't think there's a lot of substance here. I've LOVED some Paul Thomas Anderson movies (The Master, There Will Be Blood, and Inherent Vice), but I haven't even liked his last two (Phantom Thread, Licorice Pizza). And it's not that I didn't like this, it's good...but the fact that it might sweep the Oscars this year is kind of crazy. The script is very bloated. It feels long and everything is spelled out for the audience over and over again. The biggest problem for me, though, is that everyone feels like they're in a different movie - the only tangible characters are Leo's and Chase Infinity. The rest are overdone. I like Teyana Taylor, but she's not even in this enough to matter and people are talking Oscars?? Make it make sense! I usually include Sean Penn as one of the best living actors (even though I'm wary on him as a person), and he definitely created a very specific villainous character here but it didn't match what anyone else was doing. I also love Benicio del Toro - but I don't think he's given much to do. It's just weird to me that these are considered Oscar contenders (are we giving Benicio an Oscar nom for a 2 second dance? Because that's his only memorable moment. If you want to give him an Oscar nom, at least make it for The Phoenician Scheme! That actually required much more from him as an actor.). I do think Leo is great - and it feels like a different role for him and he nails it. I like Chase Infinity, too, but as soon as she appears I said out loud "wait, is she supposed to be a teenager? She looks 25." and then proceeded to look it up, and yes, she is, in fact, 25 years old. Aside from the mismatched cast, I do like the actual movie. Some of the scenes are great, and funnier than I was expecting. It's a fun ride, and it feels like the stakes are high. I just don't see how this is the best of the best. 

5. Jay Kelly -
Another snoozefest! Who the fuck gives a shit about a multi-millionaire aging mega celebrity having a mid-life crisis? Like, truly? I like George Clooney, but this is just an exercise in narcissism that is on another level. The life of a wealthy white male actor is, like, the least interesting focal point for a film in 2025 that I can think of. I don't always like Noah Baumbach films. He has a LOT of 3 star movies (Marriage Story and The Squid and the Whale are 3.5 stars). I think he's a better writer than he is a director. Usually he's very detailed and his stories feel personal. But I actively disliked everything about this movie. I particularly hate when actors do "acting" scenes because they are usually terrible (the only recent good ones are Emma Stone in La La Land and Margot Robbie in Babylon). George is not a good enough actor to pull this off. And again, I like George Clooney - I grew up watching E.R. and my best friend had the biggest crush on him. We would watch One Fine Day and From Dusk Till Dawn on repeat, but he's never really "acted" - he's always just George Clooney. And this is the MOST George Clooney he's ever been - there's even an ending that shows a reel of his acting resume that I think we're supposed to be emotional about. It's so fucking dumb. The film is also full of nepobabies - Eve Hewson, Riley Keough, Laura Dern, the Sandler daughter (I don't know which one is which), and Emily Mortimer's daughter (side note - Mortimer actually co-wrote this, which honestly makes me think a little less of her. Also, another side note, I just found another nepobaby connection - the kid from the latest season of The White Lotus is Mortimer's son!), which just makes me have even less sympathy for everyone. Also, the casting of Charlie Rowe and Louis Partridge as a younger version of Clooney and Billy Crudup is probably the worst casting I've seen all year - and they are both AWFUL in the flashback scenes. Like, pure fucking torture. There's a whole scene in which George rides a train with the normies to be more relatable - it's so fucking pretentious. I was just basically screaming "fuck off" during every single scene. 


Thursday, January 1, 2026

Best and Worst Films of 2025

You guys!! This was such a terrible year for movies for me!! I've only seen THREE 4 star films! How is that possible?? There are still a few movies for me to catch, so definitely check out my list once I update it in July. But here's what I have so far...

Best

1. Bugonia 
2. Thunderbolts*
3. Sinners
4. One Battle After Another
5. Eddington
6. Novocaine
7. Weapons
8. Caught Stealing
9. Fantastic 4: First Steps
10. Roofman 


Worst
1. A Minecraft Movie
2. Love Hurts
3. Holland
4. Highest 2 Lowest
5. The Gorge
6. Mountainhead
7. The Old Guard 2
8. Freakier Friday
9. The Thursday Murder Club
10. Snow White (2025)