Impossible marathon - Dead Reckoning (formally Dead Reckoning Part 1) is very controversially at the top of my M:I rankings. I just had a lot of fun with it and I loved the entire arc with Vanessa Kirby & Hayley Atwell. And I loved the addition of Pom Klementieff. The women just really shined. And the big action spectacles were, in fact, spectacular. I was looking forward to this, and very disappointed that it received mostly middling reviews (especially by fans of the franchise). I think the biggest, most glaring problem with this one, is that it follows in the same footsteps of other M:I films that over-explain the plot. It has "explain it to me like I'm five" energy. I was practically screaming at the screen "WE UNDERSTAND THE PLOT! MOVE ON!". It's fascinating how dumb this franchise thinks its audience is. I appreciate that it goes through the M:I history, but it also makes the movie feel sooooo bloated. It's almost 3 hours long - and clips from previous films takes up like 1/2 of the movie. There is stuff that I like - they continue Atwell's storyline. They give Pom even more to do. And I like that they give us a satisfying conclusion (although, I'm sure there is already a reboot planned - in which case I nominate Taron Egerton in the Ethan Hunt role. I don't usually push for him in big Blockbusters - Wolverine? NO THANKS! Bond? GET OUT OF HERE! But I can totally see him taking this franchise and making it his own, AND he can do the Tom Cruise run, which is essential - watch Carry On for proof. They'll probably pick someone lame, though. Like Glen Powell. Mark my words.). Anyway, I just think this is a frustrating watch, and it feels like an eternity, instead of being a fun, fast-paced, action film. And I'm really mad at who they kill off. So unnecessary!
2. The Hand that Rocks the Cradle (2025) - I remember liking the original (I think it was Rebecca De Mornay? I don't remember who played the other woman, though? Whatever happened to De Mornay, though? She was great in those 90s thrillers.). But I was really excited by the casting of this - Maika Monroe AND Mary Elizabeth Winstead??? I'M IN! But then I quickly realized that the casting is kind of off or maybe it's just the character development, because they make it seem like Monroe is supposed to be in her 20s and Winstead is mid-40s but they are only 8 years apart in real life? It just doesn't work for me. I think they just make Monroe's character a little too immature. And the whole movie is a mess. I paused it when there was only 40 minutes left, only to realize that absolutely NOTHING has happened yet. It's all lead-up, and the payoff is not worth it at all. Winstead is the highlight, as this woman who is being gaslit and made to look like a crazy Karen type middle-aged white woman. It's frustrating that her husband doesn't take her seriously, but they do preface it with her having a previous mental episode. But when it comes to the person that is caring for your kids, you should trust your wife's instinct. Period. The ending of this goes really off-the-rails too - there is absolutely no reason why her friend would invite this psycho woman to his home to confront her. It's just stupid. This whole exercise seems pointless. I don't remember the original enough to know what's changed, but this didn't feel like it's modernized for today's audience at all.
3. A House of Dynamite - This is a very good film, despite a very unsatisfying ending. I think it's a distant entry into Kathryn Bigelow films, though. Like, this would be at the bottom of my ranking. But that's because her two most recent films are practically masterpieces. And I actually prefer The Hurt Locker over Zero Dark Thirty, which might be a minority opinion (although it is the won she won the Oscar for, so I'm right!). The Hurt Locker is probably among my favorite films of this century. The fact that this film is a STREAMING Netflix movie instead of being released in a theater is MIND-BLOWING. Cinema really has changed. If you told me six years ago that an Oscar-winning director's new film was going straight to streaming and that's completely normal, I would not have believed you. The cast for this is also MIND-BLOWING, and I don't feel like that's advertised at all. I only knew that Idris Elba and Rebecca Ferguson were in it, and I was under the impression that they were the "stars" of the film. But that's not the case at all. They are both only included in a part of the film (separately). It also stars Anthony Ramos (love him!), Jared Harris, Jason Clarke, Willa Fitzgerald and several others who have such tiny roles, I would even consider cameos (like Greta Lee, Kyle Allen, Kaitlyn Dever and ONCE AGAIN the guy who played Prince Eric in the live-action Little Mermaid. I might have to learn his name if he keeps being in stuff. UGH.). Anyway, I think the beginning and the middle of this film is super strong - lots of tension, life-or-death situations, impossible choices to make, etc., but I got tired of seeing the same story told over and over again. This kind of does the whole different perspective of the same thing storytelling, but it wears thin by the end. And then it just ends. I get it, it's not supposed to be a disaster film. But there are other ways to end it. I also wish I got to know certain characters a bit more - I need depth and it's all surface.
4. Jurassic World: Rebirth - What the fuck is this? Is this the worst Jurassic Park movie of ALL TIME??? It just might be. The more I think about it, the more I HATE it. It's just so stupid from beginning to end. And ScarJo has never been worse. And that's saying a lot, especially if you've seen 1/2 of the Avengers movies. I wish Jonathan Bailey wasn't in this because I want to love him, but between this and Wicked, he's turned me sour on him very quickly. Mahershala Ali is the only innocent one here. There is also an entire family that takes up 1/2 of the story that is not advertised at all. And almost feels added in to make the audience care about...someone. Because we certainly don't care about any of the main characters. They're all assholes. Definitely rooting for the dinosaurs, but of course, they only kill the side characters that have like 3 lines, until the end, and even then, they only kill the "bad guy". I can appreciate that they bring back a beloved scene from the novel (I haven't read it), which is the river raft scene. I remember being confused as a kid because the Jurassic Park ride at Universal Studios - which was THE BEST RIDE EVER - was a rafting ride in a big yellow raft and then at the end the T-Rex jumps out at you and you fall down a waterfall. It was a BLAST....but there was no river raft scene in the movie (it was cut from the original). So, when the girl sees the raft, I was like "YES!!! That's COOOOOOL! LET'S GO!" But the scene is so fucking stupid. The T-Rex would DESTROY that raft in a millisecond. Let's be real. And the ending is so dumb - obviously setting up for sequels, but also they cure Cancer. Apparently. That's what the whole plot is. Genetic samples from dinosaurs cure cancer. Sure.
5. Hedda - I wanted to love this. Truly. As a big fan of the Ibsen play Hedda Gabler, I thought this would be in my top 10 of the year. It STARS Tessa Thompson! Should be a 4 star film, minimum! Instead, it's fine - 3 stars, but that's very generous. I like some aspects - the sound design is great (aside from the heavy breathing beats, which were annoying. But the percussion sound that follows Eileen around as she's searching for her manuscript is topnotch!), it looks gorgeous (it's like they took the decadent style of The Great Gatsby and combined it with a Shakespearian story), and some scenes are GREAT. But, I can't get past Tessa's accent. I think it's supposed to be, like, posh or something but it sound SO FAKE and like she's trying so hard, it's almost unbearable to listen to. I liked her performance otherwise. The costumes are SO UGLY, which is a big disappointment, because a lot of times when period pieces bore me, I can at least focus on the wardrobe, but literally every single one of these dresses are ugly and look terrible on the actress instead of flattering. There's some bad lighting decisions too - which is interesting because black people are often not lit properly in film and photography, which is why it's important to have diversity among the crew. This is directed by a black woman, Nia DaCosta, and it's still...bad? There are scene in which Thompson absolutely GLOWED, but then in the next scene she'll look like a background character because she's not lit. It's weird. It's too obvious to not be intentional, but I think your star, especially if the star is playing someone as iconic as Hedda Gabler, should shine the whole time. I also don't like the ending. The play is one of the most shocking endings of a stage play...ever. KEEP IT! IT'S GOOD! Not every ending has to be ambiguous for fuck sake!



















