Monday, January 13, 2025

Movie Marathon: Jurassic Park

1. Jurassic Park - This is in my Top 10 Films of All Time list (I don't actually have a list, because that's too daunting, but I'm confident this statement is true!). I've mentioned it before, but when I saw this in the theater with my mom, I was 12 years old and it was the greatest thing I had ever seen in my life. When it was over, I looked at my mom and asked "can we watch it again?" and we did. She bought tickets for the next showing and we sat and watched it again immediately after. I still think the kitchen scene is one of the best scenes in a movie ever - the tension and suspense is so good, but the kids really sell it. Even after seeing it dozens of times, I still sit in suspense. I think the last time I watched this was for the 20th anniversary, there was an IMAX 3D release of it. The 3D was annoying, but it was still spectacular on the big screen, and better than 95% of modern blockbusters. I think another reason that it's so good is because of the pace - it is RELENTLESS. Once the first dinosaur attack happens with the jeep scene, it doesn't let up until the very end. It has a lot of quotable dialogue - one of my favorite lines of dialogue is "dinosaur eats man; woman inherits the Earth". But I feel like "hold on to your butts", "clever girl" and "life...uh...finds a way" are lines that still gets used today. I love the chemistry between Sam Neill and Laura Dern, and the relationship that forms between him and the kids is really sweet. And Ellie Sattler is one of the best female characters in a blockbuster movie! I loved her so much as a kid. It's just a perfect movie. The End. 

2. The Lost World: Jurassic Park - It's WILD to me that Jurassic Park is the one of the greatest films ever, but every single sequel has been shit (I have some love for Jurassic World, but it still doesn't compare). I think I actually blocked both of the original sequels out of my mind, because rewatching them felt brand new to me. I know I watched them both (and I'm pretty sure I watched them both in a theater - and was severely disappointed). Meanwhile, my husband could recite the whole thing to me and he's fairly certain he hasn't seen it since he was like 12. I hate having such a bad memory. I was hoping that I was just too hard on them, and that maybe with this rewatch, I would find some positives, but NOPE - both The Lost World and III are absolute GARBAGE! This one is worse, though. I think the biggest mistake is how annoying all of the characters are. I love Jeff Goldblum in the first one, but Malcolm is so fucking annoying in this - I almost wouldn't have minded if he was eaten by a dino! Ditto for Julianne Moore's character. And Vince Vaughn as a tough guy??? LOL. It's also very boring. And the action scenes are just plain bad - it's like watching the Wild Wild West stunt show at Universal Studios (that's not a dig at those performers - the show is great, but it's over done for a live audience. A film should be smoother and more sophisticated than that). A lot of it is dumb (like, I don't think a gymnastic swing from an 11 year old would knock a DINOSAUR on its ass). And I thought the dumb stuff in the new movies - like bringing the dinosaurs into the states was a *new* mistake (because, again, I don't remember the plot of these sequels at all), but apparently it started with this one! So stupid. And the T-Rex ATE THE DOG?! WHAT THE FUCK?!

3. Jurassic Park III - Okay, so this is not quite as bad as The Lost World, but it's still pretty bad. There's ONE good scene (the pterodactyl scene). I like that they bring back Grant, but it only works if they brought back Ellie (for more than one scene). I know there is a backlash against Ellie becoming a housewife - and that they aren't together. But I think it makes perfect sense for her character. She clearly wants to be a mom in the first one, and it doesn't make her any less of a strong female character for wanting that (people are so fucking weird about women wanting to be moms, and this is coming from someone who doesn't have kids and doesn't want them). I used to be a big fan of Tea Leoni, mostly because of Bad Boys (they definitely missed a trick by not including her in any of the sequels). But she's bad in this, and again, her character and her husband (played by William H. Macy) are fucking grating. I wanted them both to die. I feel like this one has slightly more intensity than the second, but it's still just...blah. I was bored, and I shouldn't be bored by dinosaurs eating people. And I shouldn't be rooting for the dinosaurs.

4. Jurassic World - I actually really liked this movie on first watch, and I still enjoyed it on a second watch. It's FUN! I like that it has the same beats as the original, but it goes further into new territory with new characters. It's kind of crazy to me that this came out almost 10 years ago??! It still feels so new (but they are already rebooting this series with ALL NEW characters! Time flies, for real). I think I appreciate this even more after watching the original sequels because this is honestly so good compared to them. Also, I like Chris Pratt - I don't care what anyone says. He seems like a good dude, but people vilify him because he's...religious? And yet, Tom Cruise gets to be the biggest action star in the world and nobody says a thing? It doesn't make any sense to me. The rest of the cast is great - Bryce is wearing me down. I like her, for the most part, in these movies, and I loved her in Argylle. Also, I didn't realize that one of the kids was Nick Robinson?! I love him! And some great supporting characters - Judy Greer, Jake Johnson, Lauren Lapkus, AND OMAR SY!! (I didn't remember him in this AT ALL!!). Also, BD Wong makes an appearance (fun fact: he's in the most Jurassic movies - a total of 4). I really like seeing a working Jurassic Park/World that runs like any other amusement park. Some of the new technology is cool - like the globe car things! SO COOL! Plus, there's a few really memorable scenes, like the Jimmy Buffett cameo with him grabbing his margaritas before running (haha!), and the assistant woman's death is so fucking funny. Also, I love when Pratt says "it's part raptor" and then the raptors turn back and look at him. It's chilling. I also like that they give a little more substance to the dinosaurs, with Pratt training the raptors (I love Blue so much!!!). Overall, I just think they got everything right - it's never going to be as good as the original, but this is a great reboot. It's too bad that the sequels follow the same fate as the original trilogy. 

5. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom - Weird that the second one in both Park and World are the worst ones. You would think that the creators learned their lesson form The Lost World, but NOPE. They make almost the same identical mistakes. I can't even think of anything nice to say about it except that it's nice to see Jeff Goldblum, but he should have had a bigger role. And, again, I love Blue - literally the only one I care about by the end of this. The plot is absolutely RIDICULOUS with the whole volcano on the island and trying to save the dinosaurs. How exactly are they going to do that? It's asinine. And the ending is even less interesting knowing that they already did the whole dinosaurs in the city thing with the original trilogy. I was so bored that I stopped paying attention - I almost missed my favorite dumbest scene in film history - a thousand pound dinosaur walking on top of a glass roof. I realize now that the dinosaur *figures out* that it's glass and that it breaks, so he walks on the support beams because that would totally work. It's somehow actually even stupider than I remember! Also, I hate Justice Smith. 

6. Jurassic World: Dominion - Okay, so I didn't actually rewatch this one, but I did try to. Before doing this marathon, I looked to see if all the movies were streaming and THEY WERE. And then, as I got to Dominion, a new month started and it DISAPPEARED and made me FURIOUS. This is why I miss Netflix discs (*sobs forever*). I waited until a new month to see if it would reappear on a streaming service, but no such luck. But it only came out a few years ago, and I actually DO remember it! I rated it 2.5 stars, and I think considering my other rewatches, that seems fair. It's slightly better than all the other sequels. They brought a little bit of the nostalgia back with the original characters, and nobody is super grating like in all the other sequels (oh wait...I think the pilot lady pissed me off? I can't remember now...). Anyway, I'm very disappointed, overall with this marathon - again, it's so crazy to me how brilliant the first movie is and how awful most of the sequels are. I do look forward to another reboot, though - only because the cast is great! Jonathan Bailey and Mahershala Ali?! YES! I'm not always the biggest fan of Scarlett, but she's usually in very successful blockbuster franchises. Bring it on!

Ranking: 
Jurassic Park
Jurassic World 
Jurassic World: Dominion 
Jurassic Park III
Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom 
The Lost World: Jurassic Park

Monday, January 6, 2025

4 Thoughts on The Golden Globes

1. The Host - So, I really liked Nikki Glaser as the host. I think she was really charming, seemed extremely happy and grateful to be on that stage, and she told some really funny & sharp jokes - and most were told in a loving way rather than mean-spirited. I laughed multiple times - some of my favorite jokes: 

- The Bear, The Penguin, Baby Reindeer...these are not just things found in RFK's freezer, these are TV shows nominated tonight.
- We have got some huge movie stars here tonight: Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett, Colin Farrell. And we have some huge TV stars as well: Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett, Colin Farrell.
- Who else is here: Oh look! It's two-time holocaust survivor Adrien Brody!
- If you lose tonight, please just keep in mind that the point of making art is not to win an award, the point of making art is to start a tequila brand so popular that you never have to make art again. 

She also did a very funny Adam Sandler impression with Sandler joining her. It seems like she's getting some pretty rave reviews of this hosting gig, and I'm happy for her. I would definitely be happy to see her get more hosting gigs in the future. My husband is a big fan of hers (although I still couldn't get him to watch this - he watched part of the monologue, but he doesn't even understand half of the references so it was pointless). I think she did too many costume changes that seemed unnecessary (the only relevant one was the pink sparkly number because she did a Wicked/Conclave joke), but overall, she did great. On a side-note, does she remind anyone else of Jennifer Lawrence? 

2. The Show - The host was great, but the rest of it??? A MESS. There were so many technical problems, and the angle of the camera for the presenters was WILD. It was so awkward - and the audience behind them is so distracting especially when one of them was Jeremy Strong dressed like that. I also didn't even notice the trivia at the bottom during each presenter's introduction because it was so tiny. I only noticed it because someone mentioned it on Twitter, and I was like "oh is that what that is???". The stage also seemed very small - and everything just felt crowded. Most of the presenters failed hard. The only presenters who were solid were Seth Rogen & Catherine O'Hara doing a whole riff on their successful Canadian roles (all made up), Harrison Ford & Anthony Mackie - once Mackie went off-script and started announcing his love for Sebastian Stan and then beat-boxing while Ford opened the envelope. Also, Melissa McCarthy, and dare I say, Awkwafina were really funny (I don't typically like Awkwafina, but she played off of Melissa well). Everyone else, LITERALLY everyone else (!!) made me cringe. Also, since when do they not air the Cecil B. DeMille winner??? Viola Davis deserves that moment and we deserve to see it! WHAT THE FUCK?! And they should always show clips from the nominated performances. It's weird that the only clips they showed were for the stand-up comedy category?? Nobody even cares about that award. The winners gave fairly boring speeches (Demi was the most heartfelt), but Colin's made me smile - him thanking Carolina from Craft Services was really cute. 

3. The Winners - I'm so happy for Demi Moore - what a win! I can not believe that she's been doing this for 45 years and this is her first award for acting?! That's insane to think about. I know a lot were rooting for Mikey Madison (I haven't seen Anora yet, but I'm a Better Things fan, so I love Mikey), but she's young and this is really her first critically acclaimed film - she'll have plenty of other opportunities ahead of her. I know everyone loves Sebastian Stan, but I don't get it. I haven't seen either of his films this year, though, so I'll keep my mouth shut (for now). I can't stand Adrien Brody, but he's a good actor. His awards run is going to be just as insufferable as last time (I can tell by the speech he gave - also when the film won he ran and stood up on one of the chairs and I was like "OH NO NOT AGAIN", but he stopped himself and let the actual filmmakers have their moment). I also think it's SO disrespectful to reward lead performances in the supporting category. Zoe has MORE screentime than the supposed lead performance??! (Yes, someone counted up their screentime and I'm glad because this is an egregious count of category fraud). I love Zoe - and she's been in the business for a longtime. Surely, she deserves recognition, but this is not the way. I also don't think Emilia Perez is an award-worthy film (and I liked it!). It seems to be a very contentious film among critics - and I can see the backlash (especially the critique from Mexicans, as it's made by a French man who had "no interest" in doing research on Mexican culture). As for the television side, I still haven't seen Shogun (I KNOW! IT'S ON THE LIST!), so I can't speak for all those wins (but I love Anna Sawai!). I did root for Harrison Ford though (a first!) because he's incredible in Shrinking. I love Hacks and it's probably the best actual comedy on television right now (aside from shows that never get nominated like It's Always Sunny). Jodie Foster is great, but she's stolen both the Emmy (from Juno Temple) and now the Golden Globe (from Cristin Milioti - I think Cristin will get the Emmy though since Foster already won, she's got no real competition so far). Overall, I like that aside from Shogun sweeping, a lot of the awards were split to give multiple films & series wins. It makes things interesting for the Oscars and the Emmys (the awards that actually matter). 

4. The Fashion - OH NO what happened to Emma Stone's hair?!!! I know it's for a role, but I screamed at that pixie cut. She's gorgeous so she still looks good (of course!), but I love her gorgeous red hair. Anyway, I also wish her dress was much shorter - the length was so weird, it looked like she was going to trip over it. The worst part of the whole show is that I don't even have a favorite dress - they were all so boring. A sea of gold dresses that just screamed "please nominate me for an Oscar!", among a sea of red dresses. And I guess long gloves are back in, and I hate it on most; it always distracts from the dress (see: Kerry Washington - I LOVE the hot pink dress, but she styled it ALL WRONG). I guess I'll pick Elle Fanning as my favorite. I don't love the dress, but I appreciate that she took a risk. And I think best, overall look, is clearly Zendaya (although, the dress is ill-fitting in the stomach, and she knows it - she keeps pulling at it and covering her stomach the whole time on the carpet). I appreciate Ayo's nod to Julia Roberts with the grey suit. I also think it's really cool that two big stars wore dresses that they've worn before (Cate Blanchett & Viola Davis)!!! I wish more stars did that - it's such a waste to have a dress that you wear ONCE! The worst dressed is obviously Ali Wong - she looks like she killed a Muppet. I like that the men went all out for their red carpet looks too - it should be fun for them too! I kind of like the Tiffany blue look from Andrew Scott. And Andrew Garfield looked great in that hunter green suit. But, Glen Powell looked a mess (take the glasses off!). And, of course, I have to mention Jeremy Strong - clearly wanted to be the center of attention with this look and he succeeded (that's not a compliment). 

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Thoughts on 5 Films

1. Cuckoo -
I liked this, but I was a little disappointed with it. There have been so many horror BANGERS this year (Smile 2, Abigail, Immaculate, The First Omen, Blink Twice), and this is just slightly above average. I think Hunter Schafer is A STAR and definitely the best part of the movie (I hated her Euphoria character though). She's so good in this - it's more subtle than some other horror performances this year, but definitely among the best. I'm not sure she quite passes for 17 anymore though (which is why they should let Euphoria go - they are all adults now and look like it!). But I think Jessica Henwick is a terrible actress (I've seen her in multiple things and she's awful in all of them), and I'm not loving the cartoonish German accent that Dan Stevens is attempting here. Overall, I just found this very boring. There's creepy stuff that happens, and you start to question what's reality, but it's not that interesting. By the end, I could barely pay attention. I don't even have enough to say about it to fill out this tiny paragraph, so that's a problem. 

2. Juror #2 -
I think Clint Eastwood is a solid director, and I typically enjoy his films - but he's also made some very, very, very bad movies (most recently The 15:17 to Paris). I do like the immediate twist of this - I was not expecting the reveal; and I definitely wasn't expecting something like this to be revealed so quickly in the story. But unfortunately, after the reveal, the film just becomes a dull 12 Angry Men remake. I like the cast - I'm now a fan of Nicholas Hoult, but that wasn't always the case. He's officially won me over, though. Plus, Zoey Duetch is another great nepo baby. And Toni Collette, Kiefer, Chris Messina - all solid. It's just kind of unrealistic that the idea that she was hit by a car wasn't immediately assumed (she was killed by a blunt object on the side of the road during a rainy night), when it's the most obvious answer. And then when it's suggested - everyone is like "oh yeah, that's a good point, why didn't anyone look into that?" LOL. It's just stupid. On a side note, I will never get picked for a jury. I've gotten jury duty a few times (during Covid was the best - it was all online and I could just stay home and read a book while they did their role call and questions), but I'll never be picked because I have an immediate family member in prison. I remember the first time I had jury duty, I was like 24ish, and one of the last ones left to be questioned. I think both lawyers thought I was a slam dunk pick. But then I got asked to come up to the judge for more questions and one of the lawyers asked The Question and they were stunned when I said "yes". She repeated it "You have an immediate family that was convicted of a crime", "yes, my father", "is he in jail?", "yes, federal prison", "for what?", "ummm...something to do with smuggling weapons across the border, but he's also part of a drug cartel, and he's probably killed people" and then the guy on trial said "DAMN, little white girl has seen some shit!" And then the judge shouted "ORDER" (*just* like they do in the movies! HAHA!) and I was dismissed. Anyway, that's my jury duty story. Probably more interesting than this movie! 

3. Lee - 
 A fairly average and unmemorable biopic that feels like Oscar bait that just didn't take. I know Winslet put a lot of effort into getting this film made, and she really wanted to bring Lee's story to life, but I don't feel like this story is told well at all. And Winslet is SO BAD at accents sometimes, it's wild to see the praise she receives. It's not really that it's bad, it's just that she's so inconsistent with it. It will sound great in one sentence and then the next she sounds like a cartoon character. Plus, Lee Miller is from Poughkeepsie NY (which is very close to where I grew up) not NYC, yet Winslet puts on this rough-around-the-edges gravelly NYC accent that just sounds ridiculous coming out of her mouth. This is making it sound like I don't like Winslet, but that's not true. Titanic is one of my favorite movies of ALL TIME, and I've loved Winslet since Heavenly Creatures. But I feel like she's one of those actresses that gets over-praised for every role. It's okay to admit that she's bad sometimes. She's not exactly bad in this, but it feels like she's trying too hard. She does have some excellent moments, but the scene steeler is definitely Marion Cotillard - although it feels like she originally maybe had a bigger role that was cut down? Andrea Riseborough also gives a terrific performance - fully encompassing her character (she's definitely a chameleon actress, sometimes I don't even recognize that it's her). The worst casting decision, is very obvious. Andy Samberg in a serious role??? NO THANK YOU. Anyway, it follows all the biopic beats that you expect it to. The biggest mistake (aside from casting Samberg) is the interviewer scenes, especially finding out that it's her son doing the interviewing. It breaks up the story too much, disturbs the flow, and becomes frustrating. 

4. Dear Santa -
The bottom of the barrel of 2024 movies. I didn't think it would be worse than Red One, but it's somehow SO MUCH worse. I can usually laugh along with the dumb humor of the Farrelly brothers and Jack Black, but this is hard to watch. I don't think I laughed once. And, I'm sorry, *spoiler*, but the whole dead brother thing is awful?! And the ending with him ALIVE? What an awful message for children! It's so fucking weird and I can't imagine that any parents (especially parents who have lost children) will enjoy this nor will they want their children to watch this and think that they can just *wish* for people to be alive again. The acting is atrocious. This is going to sound mean, but there's a reason that Hayes MacArthur has never hit it big - he's an awful actor (and I met him several times - he was really good friends with one of the producers of the film company I worked for a long time ago. It was him, Erik Palladino, and the guy that plays Fun Bobby on Friends. The four of them were trying to develop a tv series that was kind of like Extras but with actors stuck in a rut. I was a PA on it, but it never got picked up. The thing is, all of them were SO nice, except Hayes. He always acted like he was too important to even say hi to me. So I'm happy that he's in garbage like this.). Black really goes all out, and I can appreciate his commitment, but it's all so cringe for the most part. But, it's really the kids who make the whole movie practically unwatchable. I kept waiting for the story to jump forward in time so that we didn't have to watch these kids anymore but it doesn't - they are, unfortunately, in the whole thing. Ben Stiller has a memorable uncredited cameo, but otherwise this movie is atrocious. I think it says a lot that the scenes with Post Malone are the best of the whole movie. 

5. The Substance -
I loved so much about this before even watching it - knowing that it was a body horror film (Cronenberg-esque), but from a female perspective starring Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley! I'M IN. I've always loved Demi Moore. I think anyone my age did (and does). She not only made us fall in love with her in Ghost (a film I still quote all the time - I say "Molly, you in danger, girl" regularly.), she was also a such a bad-ass in G.I. Jane. It's crazy that in this, she's 62 playing a 50 year old - and she could easily pass for 45, and somehow that's still a bad thing in Hollywood. Qualley is one of the best nepo babies to ever nepo baby. She's fantastic in this. Both of them are Oscar-worthy for this and they both should be in the Lead Actress category. But Qualley is competing in Supporting, which is definitely category fraud in my opinion (a lot of the Supporting Actresses are really Lead performances this year - Zoe Saldana?? Lead. Ariana Grande?? I haven't even seen Wicked, but I can already tell you it's a Lead performance). It's also crazy that Qualley is in my favorite film of this year (this) and in one of my least favorite films (Drive-Away Dolls - My God, what a terrible movie). Anyway, this movie had me hooked right from the opening sequence - I love that it's clearly set in the 80s, without specifically saying so, because the theme is timeless. It's obviously a reference to a Jane Fonda jazzercize personality, but it could also apply to other tv personalities like Vanna White on Wheel of Fortune (one of the few women who have been allowed to age gracefully on our television and I think it's only because the audience would RIOT if they ever tried to get rid of her. She gets to go on her own terms and that's so rare and AWESOME). The timing for this story is perfectly relevant with the popularity of Ozempic (and all the other weight loss drugs that popped up recently), because it's proof that women will literally put any shit in their body if it will make them thin (or young, etc.), even if it will cause horrendous effects in the future. I could go on a whole rant about this because my best friend is taking this shit because she started gaining weight a few years ago (a very normal thing for a woman to go through at 40 years old) and instead of focusing on being healthy, her doctor prescribed her this GARBAGE. She lost a TON of weight - so much so that she looks sick and she's having all these other negative health effects (like losing her hair). My husband saw her for the first time a few weeks ago and was horrified. He didn't even recognize her at first and then told me that she looks like a "Cancer patient". BUT SHE'S SKINNY, so I guess it's all good?! I want to personally sue her doctor - it makes me furious. ANYWAY, I'm not going to go into the whole rant, but I just will never understand how anyone would sacrifice their health over their looks, when a lot of times they are one in the same. Like, eating healthy and exercising will make you look skinnier and younger too? And you'll be healthy? What's the disconnect? I'm interested to see if she's watched this yet, and what her thoughts are, but I also don't feel like fighting with her about it again. I love the way this story is told though - because it's so in your face, and it shows the stress and pressure that women are under, especially women who are in the public eye. I'm guilty of commenting on how someone is aging - I think it's just part of our culture, and unfortunately if you choose a career like this in the public eye (and get paid a shitload of money), then this is just part of the job. I'm not saying it's right, or justified, but it's just the way it is. I also think that Instagram culture is really effecting women in really negative ways. I've seen so many women critics discuss the bathroom scene that became a memorable meme of Demi wiping off her red lipstick and saying how they could relate so hard to it. And I think a lot of that unhappiness with ourselves comes from social media. I don't really pay attention to makeup that much - It takes me 20 minutes total to get ready for pretty much any occasion. But I have definitely changed my outfit multiple times because it suddenly does not look good. I know it's all in my head, but it can't be helped! But the biggest success is some of the STUNNING shots - most of which take place in the stark white bathroom. I just love everything about - love the concept, love the acting, love the execution. I really wish that I hadn't seen pictures of the "monster" at the end because it would have been even more shocking. I will admit that it's too long - 2 hours and 20 minutes is unnecessary. I could have cut 30 minutes of it without effecting anything important. 

Thursday, January 2, 2025

20 Books I Read in 2024

1. The Secret History, Donna Tartt - So I really loved Tartt's The Goldfinch, - it's so well-written, detailed and epic storytelling that spans decades (it's far better than the movie). I loved this too, although not quite as much because it felt a little too predictable. It's still very satisfying, largely due to such strongly developed and fully realized characters. It's interesting that I started to read this the same week I watched Saltburn, because they start off exactly the same. It's all about how the wealthy and entitled effect the world around them without any consequence or acknowledgment. It's also interesting that I really care about these characters even though they are murderers. I would love to see a film or mini-series adaption of this, and hopefully it's better than The Goldfinch

2. Welcome to The O.C.: The Oral History, Alan Sepinwall - You just KNOW that they wanted to add the "bitch" to the title, but couldn't. The O.C. is among my favorite series ever, which is surprising because I was never a big fan of teen melodramas that came before it (never a big 90210 fan, at all). But this series had Ryan Atwood - one of the best characters in television history, along with a ton of other great characters. It was just a fun series, but it had so much heart and witty dialogue. I think Seth Cohen/Adam Brody (along with Michael Cera), really started a movement that made the nerdy loner kid SUPER HOT all of the sudden. It's really interesting to read all the behind-the-scenes moments from the series, straight from the actors/producers/directors/etc.. There are some things that are really unbelievable - like that they made 27 episodes in one season?? That's UNHEARD of nowadays. And how Ben McKenzie blew off his future wife (literally one of the most beautiful women in the world - how could he???!). I also was surprised to learn that Doug Liman directed the pilot, because it kind of makes total sense as to why the pilot is so good. It's so streamlined and efficient in telling you exactly what you need to know; there is this unusual confidence to it, instead of the uneasiness of most pilot episodes. I knew Misha Barton got a bad rap for her behavior on this, but I'm glad that the entire cast admit that she really never did anything wrong - she was thrust into this insane popularity and she was SO YOUNG. I do think that she was the worst character and the worst actress of the show, but she didn't deserve the backlash or to killed off like that. There's a nice reflection for some of the actors - like Brody, who pretty much admits that he acted like an entitled asshole at the height of the show's popularity. But it's nice to know that some of the actors weren't total douchebags - the words "except for Rachel & Melissa" are repeated by almost everyone (when everyone was being entitled, or bratty, or emotional they would clarify "except Rachel & Melissa" who always showed up professional, grateful for the opportunity, and smiling. For the record Rachel Bilson should be a much bigger star - especially after reading what a delight she is on set. Give her another tv series!). 

3. The Silent Patient, Alex Michaelides - A friend of mine gave me this book to read and said it was "crazy". I liked the story a lot - it's a very interesting story of a woman clearly suffering from trauma, accused of murdering her husband but refuses to talk. There's references to Alcestis of Greek mythology, which I really loved (and it made me read a modern retelling of the Greek tragedy). I was definitely invested in the story, but then about 2 pages before the big reveal sentence, I realized what the twist was and HOLY FUCKING SHIT. I stopped to think about it first, like, that can't be the twist because that would be insane. And then, that sentence happens, and it just BLEW MY MIND. I stopped again, and considered starting the book from the beginning just to see if it actually makes sense, but I just continued reading instead. It's one of the best twists I've ever read. And I do think it works (there's some foreshadowing in the beginning). It's just really good - and it makes a good book spectacular. I kind of like the fact that it's almost impossible to make a film/tv version because it wouldn't work visually. It only works because we don't see the characters. 

4. Beloved, Toni Morrison - The only book I've read by Toni Morrison was The Bluest Eye (although I don't really remember it). I have Song of Solomon on my list to read this year. I was surprised that this is essentially a ghost story. I love the way Morrison writes - it's dense and layered and not an easy read. You actually have to pay attention to every word, and process it before moving on. It also feels very poetic and uplifting in parts. Totally understand why it's become such a classic - a must read for everyone. 

5. The Picture of Dorian Gray, Oscar Wilde - So, I obviously know the story, but I've never actually read the book. But, you know what's CRAZY?! I always thought Dorian Gray was a WOMAN?! I'm not sure why? I always thought it was a painting of a woman in the attic that was stealing her youth. I feel like anytime it's referenced in pop culture, they are talking about a woman??? Maybe because it's usually women who are concerned with (and judged for) aging. Anyway, once I got past my obvious ignorance, I enjoyed reading this. Wilde is a fantastic story-teller. This book flows very well, has interesting twists that I didn't know about beforehand, and a stellar ending. I loved it. Also, it's very, very gay (like it's not subtle at all) and also very, very misogynistic (which is kind of hard to get past, but it is what it is). 

6. Alcestis, Katharine Beutner - I've probably read the Euripides play (I was a Drama Studies major, but also took Latin for 6 years - we read a lot of Greek & Roman plays). I don't really remember this character, but now I'm OBSESSED. This is a stunning adaptation - the story is that of an ideal wife, Alcestis, who sacrifices herself for her husband by dying in his place and being sent to Hades. But this version tells us of Alcestis' time in the Underworld, along with a more detailed look at her life story, why she would make such a sacrifice, and who she becomes as a consequence of these actions. It's beautifully told, maintains the poetic beats of classic Greek tragedy, while feeling modern in its language and psychology of the characters. It's probably my favorite thing I've read in 2024. 

7. Before We Were Innocent, Ella Berman - I liked a lot about this book - it's a great commentary on the popularity of the True Crime genre, and how it effects the lives of people involved (whether guilty or not). I read it really quickly, and I would definitely describe it as a "page-turner". But I also think it's a bit immature and by-the-numbers. It's kind of obvious as to what happed during this horrific night, but I think it would have been more satisfying with a different ending (I won't spoil it). It's not a book that will stick with me, but it's a satisfying summer read. 

8. The Twelve Lives of Alfred Hitchcock, Edward White - I've read a dozen or so books on Hitchcock and/or his films, but I like the way this is set-up and structured to show the different layers of a person - sometimes messy, contradictory, and nuanced. It feels fresh and innovative for such an iconic and well-known person. It delves into more uncommon & unknown aspects of Hitchcock's life (I can't say I learned anything new, but I appreciate the effort put into this). It definitely made me want to do another Hitch marathon. It's been a while! 

9. The White Tiger, Aravind Adiga - I really liked the movie version of this, and was surprised by how little attention it received. I'm happy to report that the book is even better. I love the way that it is written in the first person with someone telling their life story to someone else (mostly in letters). It has a very fast, almost rhythmic pace that keeps it interesting. It's also very dark, but very funny (like the movie). I also think the character development is extraordinary - I feel like I know this person very well. Their motivation, goals, their thought-process is all laid out in a very interesting way. 

10. The Gray Man, Mark Greaney - Wow. I hated this book. I wasn't a huge fan of the movie, either, but I didn't hate it. I thought Ryan Gosling was good and the plot was good - so I thought I would give the book series a try, but I will never read any more of these books. It's so poorly written, it's almost shocking. It's so repetitive and reading action scenes is so boring and it just went on and on - I felt like I could skip a bunch of pages and not miss anything. They also kept repeating the main character's name - Court Gentry- but skipping back and forth between his first and last name, almost making it like there were two people?! "Court grabbed his gun, and as Gentry aimed it, he..." (I completely just made up a sentence, but this is how the whole book is written, I swear, it's that bad). I hated every second of it. 

11. Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer - I think it's interesting that my husband had to read this book in High School, as it's now deemed a classic (it came out in 1996 - I was already in high school so it was too new for me. My husband is 7 years younger than me). I have watched the movie, but I can't remember if I liked it or not (I've never been a big fan of Emile Hirsch, so I'm going to guess that I didn't like it). I'll never understand the psychology of people who need to traverse the most dangerous part of the Earth in order to find themselves or whatever the fuck he was doing. But this is a fascinating story - told in depth by Krakauer. His findings and research is really done well - interviewing everyone that knew Christopher McCandless before and during his deadly adventure. But I think the biggest success is Krakauer's defense of Christopher, while most dismiss him as either unwell or selfish. He, himself, is an adventurer (he's climbed Everest) - so he understands this story on a deeper level than most. 

12. Me, Elton John (Audiobook) - It literally took me like 2 years to listen to this whole thing because I really don't like Audiobooks. But I DO like listening to my love, Taron Egerton's, voice and he is the narrator of this so that's an obvious plus. I LOVE when he tries to do voices/pseudo-impressions of other people too - it's so funny. He's just the best. It's more than a little repetitive, especially if you've watched Rocketman. I do like that it goes beyond the Rocketman narrative and talks about how Elton lives now - happily married with children, sober and loving life. It's very inspirational and proves that people can, in fact, change and become the people that they aspire to be. I also like that Elton lays it all out - flaws and all. He can admit that he's acted like an entitled asshole in the past (and even in the present), and it's something he's actively working on. Self-awareness is so refreshing because I think most are too scared to acknowledge their own actions. 

13. The Buried Giant, Kazuo Ishiguro - It's so crazy that the last Ishiguro book is one of my favorites (Klara and the Sun), and this is one of my least favorites, not only by Ishiguro, but of all the books I've read in 2024. It's so boring and hard to get through - I almost gave up entirely. In theory, I should have liked it - I appreciate mythological, epic type stories, and this is exactly that, but I just found it very confusing and I didn't get to know any of the characters to care enough about them. I think maybe it would work better visually? Like, I would definitely watch a mini-series based on this story. But reading it was just rough. 

14. Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties, Tom O'Neill - HOLY FUCKING SHIT YOU GUYS. I feel like this book finally made me understand why everyone falls into conspiracy theories because the things that O'Neill discovers during his research into the Manson murders is MIND-BLOWING. Obviously, there's always been a lot of questions and inconsistencies when it comes to the Manson murders - his cult, his connection to the CIA, the chosen victims, and the celebrities involved, but I never knew just how crazy it all is. And the names involved blew me away (I had no idea Terry Melcher was Doris Day's SON?!). This book made me get why people hate the government (although I'll never understand how they believe Trump is the answer? He's just as corrupt as any politician is. It doesn't make sense). Anyway, I think I would have benefitted from reading Helter Skelter first, because this basically goes through and annihilates everything in that book as lies and cover-ups. There are so many crazy sentences in this book that I had to read a lot of it twice - like, did I just read that correctly? For instance: there is apparently video evidence of Polanski filming his wife, Sharon Tate, getting raped?! And a bunch of famous people and law enforcement not only know about it, but hid the fact that the video exists because releasing it would have caused more pain (for who, though? POLANSKI? He should be in prison for multiple reasons - I don't care if his wife and friends were murdered in his home. He was treated like a victim when he is an abuser, and that is WILD). It's just insane - the whole time I read this I felt like I was taking crazy pills. I salute O'Neill for attempting to break through the lies and bullshit that exist in Hollywood - he really gave a large chunk of his life for this story and there's still no resolution. 

15. Where'd You Go, Bernadette, Maria Semple - I like that this is a case of not liking the movie, but the book is incredible (like The Goldfinch!). I love the way that this story is told through different perspectives, narrators, and letters. There's a good, solid mystery about what actually happened to Bernadette (and I forgot what happens in the movie, so I was still intrigued). I feel like there is way more depth to her here than in the film (Blanchett does a fine job with the character - I think a lot of the character development was cut in favor of drama). I like that it's a story about a woman deemed "crazy", but it's really the world around her that is making her this way. I think every woman can relate to that. But she seemed way more self-serving in the movie. It's very interesting to compare and also proof that it's hard to capture a "crazy" woman in a sympathetic way. 

16. Angels in America, Tony Kushner - Not technically a book, but a play, however, I want to start reading and re-reading some of my favorite plays because it's been a while. Angels in America is probably my favorite play that I've ever read & saw in person. It's just stunning - the way it weaves the AIDS epidemic in with politics, healthcare, and the effects on families, relationships, and strangers. This version I read, had some deleted scenes and an in-depth forward by Kushner, which was interesting. I also liked reading the cast lists of the many different versions of the play. It's also interesting that growing up reading this - I always leaned more towards Part 1 being my favorite, but after rereading this as an adult I appreciate Part 2 more. I also appreciate all of the stage direction that Kushner puts into place; it can all be interpreted so differently, which is why I think it's a classic. There's so much to take and learn from it. But also as a stage production - it can be told so simply or with extravagant effects, costumes, production designs etc., and both can be effective. 

17. The Silence of the Girls, Pat Barker - This is another modern retelling of a classic myth told from a side character perspective (I'm obsessed with all of them). It tells The Iliad from the viewpoint of Briseis - hardly a memorable character from the original tale, but certainly an interesting perspective considering her closeness to a lot of the main characters (she was Achilles "trophy" after conquering her hometown). While I like the story - I don't think this is written as well as some others that I've read (like Circe and The Song of Achilles). Barker does a trilogy with these stories, so I will still read the next one in the series, but I'm a little disappointed with it. I feel like it's missing something - there's no soul to it. 

18. Post-Traumatic, Chantal V. Johnson - Hated it. The main character is so narcissistic, self-indulgent, insecure, and under the impression that she's been through more "trauma" than anyone else. I'm sorry, but we all have our shit, and sometimes it's because someone has been through childhood trauma that they, in turn, can show more empathy towards others. But this woman has NO empathy. She acts like a spoiled child. I don't always have to like the main character to enjoy a story, but there's no story here. It's just about her and how awful she thinks her life is and how awful everyone around her is (even though they aren't. I don't blame the guy she meets for ditching her. She's annoying as fuck to him, and admittedly very fake. He probably felt that she wasn't authentic in any interaction and PEACED OUT. Good for him!). I specifically try to read books by non-white authors because I want to learn about other cultures, experiences; open up my world view a bit, but this woman hates herself so much that I have nothing to learn from her. The whole book is trash. 

19. Conversations with Friends, Sally Rooney - UGH... Two books in a row that I absolutely hated. I wasn't expecting to hate this because I liked reading Normal People (I was a little disappointed by it, but I still liked it). But this book fucking sucks. I hate everyone in it and there is no point to any of it. And the title is misleading because none of these people are friends. I would describe them as ex-lovers, enemies, current lovers, and some strangers, but never friends. It's honestly characters like these (and in Post-Traumatic) that makes me understand why everyone hates women - they really perpetuate the stereo-type of women being narcissistic and manipulative. And stupid. The only character I care about in this story is Nick - who is a married man in his 30s having an affair with a 21 year old, so I shouldn't care about him at all. I think I'm supposed to care about Frances, but she's a needy asshole. I initially thought I would add the miniseries to my watchlist (I like Joe Alwyn and Jemima Kirke), but after reading this, I'm having second thoughts. I should probably skip it. 

20. Making Movies, Sidney Lumet - This is a really good read for anyone interested in filmmaking. I like that Lumet writes as if he's talking directly to you - distractions and side-stories appear, but still relate to the topic at hand. He also talks film in very basic, understandable terms - and explains even the simplest parts of making a film. It's extremely digestible even for someone who has never read anything about film. I think I would have liked this even more if I was better versed in his films because all of his examples are from his own films (some I've seen - 12 Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon, Serpico, Network, Murder on the Orient Express, but a lot I haven't - The Hill, Daniel, Prince of the City are ones he talks about in depth that I haven't seen so I had no frame of reference as to what he was talking about). I think the chapter on editing was the most interesting to me, because he has a great point - he basically says that reviewers & critics simply can't discuss the editing of a film because they don't know what was filmed and what the editor had to work with. It's true, but I would also argue that I, as a viewer, can tell when a scene feels unnecessary or if something feels disconnected. But, to his point, it might not be the editors fault at all. Interesting to think about. 





Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Best and Worst Films of 2024

 Happy New Year everyone! Here's my Best and Worst of 2024 list (which will be updated in July as usual). I'm still missing quite a bit of films - I have about 20 movies on my watchlist that could potentially impact my final list. But here's what I have so far: 

Best 

1. The Substance
2. Kinds of Kindness
3. His Three Daughters
4. The Wild Robot
5. Didi
6. The Fall Guy
7. Civil War
8. A Quiet Place: Day One
9. Blink Twice
10. The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare 

Worst

1. Dear Santa
2. Red One
3. Miller's Girl
4. Drive-Away Dolls
5. Night Swim
6. Poolman
7. Subservience
8. It Ends With Us
9. Bob Marley: One Love
10. Spaceman 

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Film Retrospective Part V: Thoughts on 10 Films (pre-1980)

1. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? - [blind spot] I've seen a stage production of this, but not the movie! I didn't realize this was directed by Mike Nichols! He's so good at directing dramas in such a way that keep them interesting instead of veering into the boring territory that some dramas succumb to. It remains intense throughout - and Elizabeth Taylor is such a FORCE in this. What an incredible performance. I didn't realize that Sandy Denis is in this too (I recently watched her in The Out-of-Towners and I loved her in it). It's a strong story, and I loved all the little twists revealed. But, I just can't stand bickering couples - especially couples who fight in front of other people. It's so narcissistic to ruin someone else's time and to think you're arguments are more important. I think a lot of couples think its "cute" or something because I feel like I experience couples fighting in front of me all the time, and I just don't get it. And you know who else is annoying? Drunk people. So drunk couples fighting is just....annoying as Hell. But this is a very good movie, and I enjoyed it even knowing the story. 

2. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978) - [blind spot] I think the one from the 50s is incredible and this one is supposed to be EVEN BETTER?! I was HYPED going into this and I'm so happy to report that it is, indeed, a perfect film. 5 stars. The cast is great - I've been a big Donald Sutherland fan from when I was a kid (I was a big Buffy fan WAY before the tv show existed). Jeff Goldblum used to really know how to pick his roles, didn't he? I'm not sure what happened, but he's in some incredible films and now I've only seen him in Jurassic sequels and reboots. Also, Brooke Adams looks so much like Kate Allen that I thought it was her for almost the whole movie until I looked it up because I thought "wait, she also kind of looks like Ali MacGraw?", but she's neither. She's also married to Tony Shalhoub (things I learned while googling). This feels inspired by the original, but it's definitely its own thing, which I appreciate. The sound is superb - the screeching of those swings is a sound that will haunt me. I can finally say that I've seen the film with the Donald Sutherland creepily pointing at the camera gif. LOL. 

3. Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? - [blind spot] I've seen parts of this movie, but never the whole thing at once. I love learning about the history between these two iconic women, Joan Crawford & Bette Davis. I think Davis is the star here though - the range she shows in this is stunning. I'm pulled in right from the opening credits with the still shots of the car that paralyzed the sister, along with the shots of the broken doll. The crazy thing is - I didn't know about the twist in this movie??? HOLY SHIT! It's so good! The line "you mean all this time, we could've been friends?" is an all-timer of a line. I'm surprised at how dark it gets, too - the scene when she starts beating her?! I was shocked. My only criticism of the film is that it's too long and it drags a bit. If it were 30 minutes shorter it would be a 5 star movie (editing is important!). I would actually love a modern day remake of this starring the Fanning sisters. Someone in Hollywood needs to get on this idea STAT. 

4. The Rocky Horror Picture Show - [rewatch] It's been a long time since I've watched this, but I listen to the Glee version of some of these songs regularly (haha!). I was never one of the cult-like fans of this, but I do like the movie. My husband told me that his mom used to put this on every Halloween, so I decided to rewatch it this past Halloween because I think that's a cute tradition (probably not an appropriate movie to put on for children? But they all turned out fine). Tim Curry is absolutely iconic in this role - and I don't think that's hyperbole. Some of the dialogue is hilarious ("a triumph of your will" is one of my favorites). I love so many other things about it, but I don't think it's any higher than a 3.5 star film. It feels long for a 100 minute movie, and some of the songs slow it down. However, I've given it 4 stars with this rewatch simply because of the cultural impact and Curry's performance. It's kind of insane that this movie was made in the 70s because I'm pretty sure if it was made today it would be called "woke campy garbage" or something to that effect. 

5. Above Suspicion (1943) - [blind spot] This is another movie that could easily get a modern remake - actually, maybe one already exists? I'm not sure. It sort of reminds me of Mr. & Mrs. Smith (more the tv show because they know each other are spies). It seems really far-fetched and ludicrous, and if it leaned into that more, maybe it would have been much better. But it gets very boring, very quickly, and I zoned out for most of it, unfortunately. Love Joan Crawford in this too, though! She's so good. 

6. The Nutty Professor (1963) - [blind spot] I've seen the 90s remake with Eddie Murphy but I barely remember it. I've also seen clips of this one, and maybe the whole thing, but I don't remember it at all. I didn't realize that Jerry Lewis co-wrote and directed this too! He was such a talent. And knowing that he co-wrote it, there is absolutely no denying that it IS based on his frenemy Dean Martin (he does deny it, but it's just so Dean Martin coded - sorry, Jerry, I don't believe you!). I love how cliched the nerd version is - just hits every nerd aesthetic: glasses, buck teeth, the hair cowlick, the nasally voice, the highwater pants. It's just instantly, visually funny. Like every time Steve Urkel appeared on Family Matters, the audience would laugh before he even said anything. And Jerry is so good at the switch, too. He's incredibly believable at both of these characters. I also love that the cast bow at the end, like they are in a play. More movies should end like this. 

7. Gaslight - [blind spot] It's so interesting that this whole term of "gaslighting" someone has had such a resurgence over the past few years (although a lot of people use it incorrectly!). It was such a common theme in Hitchcock movies (Rebecca, Suspicion etc.), and other movies of that time like Diabolique (which I watched again earlier this year, and I can't stop thinking about it! It's a perfect movie). This is from the same writer as Rope, and I watched it on AMC as part of a "movies that could have been directed by Hitchcock" marathon, which is kind of funny. But also, this would have probably been a better movie if Hitch did direct it. It's still good though - but it gets very repetitive. Like, we get it - we understand what's going on - so move it along, please! Ingrid Bergman is gorgeous, though. AND ANGELA LANSBURY!!! It was her first role and she's so young and adorable! I love her so much. I hope it's obvious to every woman that as soon as he questions why she smiles at a man who smiled at her first, she should have bolted from that relationship instantly. 

8. The China Syndrome - [blind spot] This is another one of my bigger blind spot films. And I love Jane Fonda, so I'm not sure why I waited so long to watch this. She's outstanding in this, as is Jack Lemmon. I prefer him in funnier roles because he's so naturally goofy, but he's so good in this - like Oscar worthy good (he was nominated). I could live without Michael Douglas - he was basically doing a Richard Dreyfuss impression (why not just get Dreyfuss for this?). I like how the beginning of this is almost set up like a reality tv show (how it keeps rolling after her broadcast so you "see" the reality behind the camera), which is WAY ahead of its time. It's also kind of crazy that this came out 7 years before Chernobyl. I thought for sure that it was inspired by that, but no, instead it practically predicted it?! That's wild. It's a great movie, but I expected 5 stars and it barely hits 4 for me. 

9. The Maltese Falcon (1941) - [blind spot] I've watched clips of this for a film class, but not the whole thing (that's how I've seen a lot of older movies - in clips from film class. We would often be assigned to watch the movie as homework, but I didn't have time for that. I worked 2 jobs in college! And had internships!). I've never really thought of myself as a Bogart fan, but doing this whole retrospective thing has kind of changed that because I really liked him in The Big Sleep, The African Queen, and, of course, Casablanca. But this is the kind of roles that I remember him in and I find him really dull in this - his performance almost feels like a parody of a Bogart role, if that makes sense. I watched this after falling down stairs at work and stuck on my couch at home, on some major pain medication that made me very drowsy, so I wasn't paying as much attention to it as I should have. But I got the gist. It's a classic detective noir story - but nothing special about stands out to me. 

10. Chitty Chitty Bang Bang - [blind spot] I've probably watched this as a kid, but after watching this, I have my doubts that I've ever seen it because it did not seem familiar AT ALL. I was shocked that it's about a country that doesn't allow children?! IMAGINE! I would want to move there immediately. Sounds like Heaven. It seems kind of scary for a children's movie, though, right?? It was a perfect movie to wrap Christmas presents to and by the end I was belting out the "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" song along with the cast. I didn't love it, but some of it is good. I honestly thought it was a film made in the 50s, because for a film made in 1968, it should look better, right? It's obviously too long (2.5 hours), but I'm loving the intermission. There are plans for a remake for this, right? That could be interesting. 

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Thoughts on 5 Films

1. Conclave -
I get why people are putting this in their Top 10 of the year lists. It's extremely well-made. Edward Berger definitely deserves a directing nomination for this. He knows how to make a visually interesting film, as seen with his All Quiet on the Western Front remake. There are shots that are simply stunning. The character blocking is incredible- which is not something I normally critique, but I did study film a long time ago, so stuff like this stands out to me, especially when it's done so well and with so much thought. I think my disappointment is with the actual story - I've seen The Two Popes and I've watched that tv series with Jude Law (The New Pope? The Hot Pope? I don't remember what it was called), so I feel like I've had my fill of pope stories for a while, if I'm honest. This whole thing is just a chore to sit through, as I could care less about the pope. Let's not pretend the whole entire system isn't corrupt. But, I do appreciate that the incredibly boring plot, plays out like a thriller - keeping it suspenseful and intense. I think the ending is really, really, really dumb, but I also appreciate the relevancy of the modern twist - which is what the papacy struggles with (modernity). Like I said, it's all very well-made, so I understand the love for it, but it's just not my cup of tea. I'll go along with Fiennes for the Oscar though because anyone is better than the other expected nominees. 

2. Maria -
I kind of expected to not really like this because I didn't love Jackie (I did like Spencer, and I loved Ema and El Conde). The thing is, though, I don't really know much about Maria Callas, I didn't even know about the relationship with Aristotle Onassis (Jackie's husband). And, guess what? After watching this movie, I still don't feel like I know anything about her. She was an opera singer who had a public relationship with a married man? So what? She also seems like a narcissistic bitch, with the way she treats the people around her. I was waiting the whole time for this film to give me a reason for it to exist, and it never does. And, after looking at pictures of her, I don't think Angelia Jolie has even a tiny bit of resemblance to her. I don't have a better actress in mind, but there has to be someone who is of closer resemblance (I actually think Natalie Portman looks more like her than Jolie, but that would be weird to cast her as both Jackie Kennedy and Maria Callas. OR would that have been genius?? Hmmm...??). Jolie just has such strong, recognizable features and she's one of the most beautiful women in the world - a biopic is just automatically a bad casting move. But, she's probably going to get an Oscar nomination (and maybe even the win? Demi Moore should have that in the bag, but I guess we'll see how it all plays out soon). I just found this movie terribly boring. It was hard to stop myself from falling asleep. I actually was falling asleep but then the lantern scene in the rain happened and I woke up - some stunning imagery. But then it was over, and I started to doze off again. The ending with the dog crying over her dead body is so sad, though. It got me. 

3. Joker: Folie a Deux -
I don't know why there was so much visceral hate towards this? It's...fine. I rated the first Joker 3 stars, and I've given this the same. I think the first one was elevated by Joaquin's phenomenal performance (he deserved that Oscar, but only because the best performance from 2019 wasn't nominated. *cough* Taron *cough cough*), but it was mostly a love letter to 70s films like Taxi Driver, The King of Comedy, etc. And this is the same - only the love letter is to Old Hollywood musicals, referencing Fred Astaire, and famous Hollywood couples, like Sonny & Cher. After watching, I actually agree with Todd Phillips that this is not a musical. It's a Drama with musical interludes. I appreciate that it's an unexpected turn for a Joker story. I enjoyed the concept, the dream-like sequences, and Lady Gaga's voice in some of the songs sounds angelic. Joaquin gives just as much to this performance as he does in the first. I think Hollywood is giving up on his antics (being difficult to work with, dropping out of projects last-minute, etc.), so he needs to shape up because he's one of the strongest actors currently working. I liked Lady Gaga in A Star is Born, but she can NOT act, and we need to stop pretending that she can. I think her casting only works to counter-balance the fact that Phoenix can't sing (like at all - his voice is far too gravelly and weak). But it also has very little substance or focus and almost feels like a waste of time. 

4. Fly Me to the Moon -
This is a cute movie. It's not something I'll remember in a year or two, but I was entertained for the most part. I don't know HOW we haven't had a Scarlett Johansson/Channing Tatum led film before because they are absolutely PERFECT together. They need to do a rom-com STAT. It's got some great dialogue, really funny one-liners, Scarlett's dry sarcasm, and it's fast-paced. But it also should have been 90 minutes. I think I actually would have rated it a whole star higher if it had been edited down. Also, my husband, who is a big NASA space nerd, is very upset that this movie exists because it's going to amplify the conspiracy theorists "they faked the moon landing" nutjobs again. He came home from work while I was watching it and was legitimately mad that I was watching it (and enjoying it! LOL). There's literally a line that says "no-one will trust the legitimacy of NASA again" and he was like "SEEEEE!!". WHATEVER, HUBBY, it's just a movie, get over it! I will say that as much as I love the match-up between Tatum and Johansson, I do think that he feels a bit out of place in this world. And that haircut is FUNNY on him. He looks like a football player dressed up as a nerd for Halloween. That's all I really have to say about the movie, which is why I think it's going in the forgettable category. 

5. Red One -
I thought FOR SURE that this was the worst movie I would see in 2024. I'm shocked that I just watched something worse (Dear Santa - 2024 Christmas movies can't catch a break!). But this is pretty bad. Like, one star bad. I hadn't seen much about it - just that it bombed at the box office and cost a lot of money to make. I just knew it was a Christmas movie with Chris Evans and The Rock, but as soon as the talking CGI polar bear appeared, I thought "oh no, I might not be able to watch this. It may actually be unwatchable". I've never been the biggest fan of Chris Evans - and I know that's a minority opinion. I just think he's boring. Very hot. But boring. The only film that I actually liked him in was that rom-com with Anna Faris (I think it was called What's Your Number?" or was that a different Faris movie?). I don't think he's a good actor - he just lucked out with the Captain America role. And people can argue all they want about his dramatic roles being good (I see a lot of love for his performance in Defending Jacob), but I think he's especially bad when he leans into his natural Boston accent. It's just too much. As far as The Rock, I think he's been good in family friendly adventures (like the Jumanji remake), but lately he's been taking himself too seriously. He got burned by the Black Adam debacle and he's making us all suffer for it. Plus a movie that cost a reported $250 million should look FAR better than this. The CGI is terrible. It's all very ugly. The whole military vibe version of Santa is very jarring too - like, why would kids want that version of Santa? He's supposed to be jolly! I will say that the one star is only because of Kiernan Shipka. She's a lot of fun as the villain. Imagine being a petite 25 year old girl and getting a role that requires you to fight The Rock and make it believable? LOL. She's great, though. It's like she actually gets the spirit of the movie and rides along with it, while the rest of the cast is fighting against it. 

Thursday, December 19, 2024

Thoughts on 5 Films

1. Speak No Evil -
First of all, no, I have not seen the original. I tried to watch it before watching this but I couldn't find it streaming anywhere, but I will keep it on my list and hopefully it will appear somewhere soon. Second, James McAvoy is the fucking greatest. I guarantee you that he gives a stronger performance here than any of the potential Oscar nominees for this year (I haven't seen a lot of the likely nominated performances but the thought of Adrien Brody, Timothee Chamalet (Chalamet), and Sebastian Stan in the category makes me cringe so hard). Third, I somehow successfully avoided the trailer that everyone kept complaining about - apparently it was shown A LOT, and it gives too much away, which seems to be the case with every trailer, which is why I try my best to avoid them. But it was definitely hard with this because it's my LOVE James McAvoy and I wanted to watch it so fucking badly! But I didn't! So, I thought I was going to be really surprised by some big twist or something??? But unfortunately, it's very easy to figure out from the first few minutes of these people meeting each other what is going on. I kept waiting for a shock or a twist, and NOTHING! I was actually very bored, which I definitely was not expecting. I love Mackenzie Davis, though, and I screamed when I realized that Scoot McNairy is in this too!!! I love a Halt & Catch Fire reunion! I think overall, the plot is very stupid, but it is elevated by an excellent cast. McAvoy is very convincing as someone who would be very charming but very sinister in one breath (him singing "Eternal Flame" is glorious!). Davis has THE BEST facial reactions to some of the events that occur. And McNairy excels at being this dopey husband who is kind of useless but endearing. I love that when shit starts going down, she's the one that takes charge and he kind of fumbles around. I've always found that women are much better in emergency situations - mostly because it involves multi-tasking and men are generally bad at that. It's why men are better drivers - women are in constant multi-task mode and driving is something that should be a solo focus. Men can do that better. I don't know why people get so offended by basic biological facts (and I'm talking general, because I am actually a very good driver. I was taught by a retired police officer and I feel like he was a better teacher than most driving instructors because he taught me more "real world" driving and my husband is a very bad driver because he was born and raised in NJ and NJ has the worst drivers in the world. They are all so fucking aggressive). But, like I said, the plot is just stupid. I would never in a MILLION YEARS let my child on a bike with a stranger in a foreign country, and I don't think any parent would either. And then, they go back for the stupid bunny, not once, BUT TWICE?! Fuck off with that nonsense. It's also stupid that the little boy knows what's under the shed? How would he know all that stuff is down there if it's all locked up? It's still very gripping and intense at the end, but when I actually think about the movie I'm very disappointed. McAvoy's presence increases the rating by a whole star, though. 

2. It Ends with Us - *major spoilers* 
I've tried really hard to not think about this movie since I watched it last week because the more I think about it the angrier I get. I had not read the book, but from all the media attention, I knew that it was about domestic abuse. I will admit that I did not see the *twist* of the unreliable narrator, even though she literally calls herself that in the beginning. It got me. But that doesn't mean it's good. The idea is actually BRILLIANT - to show the audience her version of the events as the truth. Events that led to her being injured (she fell down the stairs, there was a fire incident and he accidentally hit me, etc), are shown to the audience so that we go - "oh, yeah, that seems like an accident". I started to question when the abuse was going to start. I think it forces the audience into an uncomfortable reality about abuse and encourages us to ask further questions/offer more support to women who may seem like they are in a perfect relationship and make excuses when the cracks start to show. I really wish the movie was good so that we could focus on this and begin to have a different conversation around domestic abuse. But the movie is FAR from good. The dialogue is rough, there is a lack of chemistry between the leads (and she often looks at him with disgust, which is weird), and it has one of the worst endings of all-time. All the light that it shines on domestic abuse is instantly dimmed with this bullshit ending. She just...leaves? She calmly asks for a divorce after giving birth to his child and he goes "yeah, you're right you should ask for a divorce". Because abusive men are apparently that self-aware??? If women could leave that easily THEY WOULD!! The issue is that most women CAN'T leave - most will fear for their lives or life of their child, but others can not leave for financial reasons! Especially if a child is involved. If the choice is staying in a warm home with food & clothing but suffer abuse, or live on the street or in a half-way house type situation where there is no guarantees and is often unsafe also, most will choose the former. And most abused women, will have their financial independence slowly drained without them realizing it because abusive men are manipulative. It's such a disservice to abused women for this film to show her *deciding* to leave as if she's deciding what to make for dinner. ANYWAY, I like Blake Lively (as an actress - some of the stuff that has come out about her has been rough, though), and I think if the director didn't cast himself in the movie, it would have been far better. But nothing could save that ending. I also think the costume designer might have been on drugs because what the fuck was she wearing for most of the film? That outfit she wears to the party?? I made the biggest "ew" face I could make. And why is Jenny Slate dressed like she's a housewife from the 60s for the majority of it? Make it make sense?! They did do a really good job of casting a younger Lively, but the casting of the younger/older Atlas is really off - they have completely different bone structure. Also, do these people realize that they are in their 40s??? They way they talk about their lives and having kids, you would think they are 28. It's all really stupid. Worse than a Lifetime movie. 

3. Carry-On -
I think my love of Taron Egerton might be clouding my judgement with this one, but I think it's a lot of dumb fun and it's entertaining as Hell!! I loved it. It's definitely a throwback to 90s action thrillers combined with director Jaume Collet-Serra's talent for anxiety-induced tension. Of course, I can see the flaws, but I choose to ignore them - at least while watching - because it's very easy to just "go with it". The cast is great - and they all really sell the plot. Bateman as the bad guy is an unexpected but lovely choice - he is someone who would just blend in at an airport, but he does cold and sinister evil, really well. I don't know much about Sofia Carson, but she has a very large online fan-base (I think she's a singer??? Definitely missed a trick by not having her and Egerton sing a holiday song together!). She's great in this - holds her own and has great chemistry with Taron. I'm used to seeing Danielle Deadwyler in more prestigious type films, but she's really fun in this. There's also lots of familiar faces among the supporting characters (Theo Rossi! Dean Norris! Trey Atwood!! - although the twist of his character is obvious from the second he appears). And as for, my love, Taron Egerton - this is a great role for him. He's great at being an "everyman" hero type character (which is what he does in Kingsman even though he's a bit more chav-like). He's also great at action scenes - definitely perfected the Tom Cruise run. When this project was announced with his name attached, I *knew* it was a good step for his career. I miss seeing his face on the big screen, but as much as people want to complain about Netflix, it is how a huge amount of the population watch movies nowadays. Having the #1 spot on Netflix WORLD WIDE is a huge accomplishment and pushes his popularity into new territory. However, I can not handle his American accent. I feel like it somehow got worse??? There are several nods to NJ (he's supposed to be from there, transplanted to LA), but with that accent??? I don't think so, buddy. As for my other nit-picking things - why would anyone put a random earpiece in their ear without sanitizing it first??? EWWWW that's so GROSS. And how can he keep walking away from his post? Do they keep just shutting down the line every time he gets up?? The whole sniper from the parking lot is supremely dumb, too. Why would a pregnant woman encourage her baby-daddy to be a COP? Also, why are her eyebrows brushed straight up and down???? Is that how young people are styling their eyebrows now? It looks so stupid. 

4. Subservience -
I expected bad, but I didn't expect this bad. I'll always stick up for Megan Fox (not for her dating life though - she makes very bad choices there) - I think she's someone who knows exactly what kind of projects are made for her and she doesn't take herself too seriously. She's also gorgeous (I'm sad that she's chosen the plastic surgery life, but to each their own!). She's definitely the best part of this movie - every single step, bad dialogue and all, she is a robot. Never faulters once! Everyone else in the movie is woeful. I couldn't figure out how I recognized the wife, so I looked her up and was like "oh, yeah, from Californication", but then I realized that she's also the little girl from The Nanny!!! How did I not make that connection before! Mind. Blown. She's bad in this, but she has one good moment when she sees the robot, that is Megan Fox, for the first time. I laughed. But otherwise, this movie plays out exactly as expected - it's like M3GAN and the tv show Humans combined, but bad. Really, really bad. And dumb. There's just no substance or point, and it's not even entertaining other than seeing Megan Fox in her underwear (but there are several other movies for that, so this is unnecessary). "Why does a robot even need undergarments"? is a question I asked myself more than a few times, mostly because I was bored. 

5. Kneecap -
I don't think I was in the best mental state to watch this - I couldn't even pay attention to the first half hour. I saw this movie gaining awards traction in the foreign film category and it showed up on Netflix, so I pressed play, but I had no idea what it was about. After about a half hour, I decided to google what the fuck I was watching and it made way more sense. As an American, I have no idea who this group is - but watching them act out their own origin story is definitely an interesting concept. But also, as a (maybe dumb?) American, I do not understand why Irish is not an official language in Northern Ireland???? WHAT? Someone explain it to me like I'm 5 because I started looking into it and it made me even more confused. Apparently it is as of 2022, but why wasn't it originally that way - like from the beginning? I don't get it, but I guess it was super controversial for these guys to rap (??) in Irish. I'm putting the question marks there because it just sounds like noise to my ears (and I love rap - but if I can't understand the words then it's hard for me to listen to - not a knock on them, more of a knock on my own understanding of the language). Their whole sound gives off more of an EDM vibe to me instead of hip-hop, but I guess in Northern Ireland this is hip-hop. Once I understood the story, it definitely started to grow on me - and even though I don't know who they are, they create very engaging characters and a very inspiring story. I think maybe the shouldn't have really advertised Fassbender in it, because he's not really - it's more of a glorified cameo which should be that - not an advertised role in the film. But otherwise, it's good!

Saturday, December 14, 2024

Thoughts on 5 New TV Shows

1. Disclaimer - I love Cate Blanchett, but I don't love this. It's definitely a chore to get through - every episode slower and more predictable than the last (I think I'm on episode 5 and nothing of note has happened). The catalyst for the story is interesting - this young, married woman is on vacation with her son, meets an even younger man and has a quick love affair with him. He gets attached and wants more, she gets upset, then her son almost drowns in the ocean so her lover goes to save him and ends up dying in the process. She can't even pretend that she knows him because she doesn't want anyone finding out about the affair. The whole situation would fuck you up, but the part I don't really understand is that she wanted him to die and doesn't say anything about him still being in the water. Way to lose any empathy from your audience. She's basically an awful person and deserves to have her life destroyed? Okay...so now what? I don't care about the main character, and this doesn't make me care about any of the supporting characters either. I guess that's why it's a chore to sit through. I can appreciate villainous characters, but I'm struggling here. I also think the time-jumping is jarring in some cases, although it's probably the only interesting aspect. I hate the iris out shots between scenes too - it just feels pretentious but also amateur at the same time. But there are some really stunning scenes - like the scene with the drowning - the way the waves crash over the camera. You really feel the intensity of the water and how it can overtake you. As far as the cast, Blanchett is untouchable. But Leila George as a younger version of her doesn't work at all for me. I keep having to remind myself that they are the same character. Her vibe is just completely different. And Sacha Baron Cohen in a serious role is jarring! Sharing a scene with Cate Blanchett is EMBARRASSING for him. Who thought that was a good idea? I also did not recognize Kevin Kline for the entire first episode. I know they probably aged him a bit, but he is 77 so he is older than I'm used to seeing him. Also I can't believe him and Phoebe Cates are still married!! Good for them. Anyway, I also hate the narration - it reminds me of Nocturnal Animals, the way that it's "telling a story", but the story is boring so it all feels pointless. 

2. Cross - I can't tell if this show is good or if Aldis Hodge is just *that* hot. I think it's the latter. I was a big fan of Morgan Freeman's version of Alex Cross from the 90s - Kiss the Girls is a fantastic movie (Along Came a Spider was just ok from what I remember). I'm also a big fan of Aldis Hodge, so this show seemed like a no-brainer for me. I just think it could have been done better. The cat-and-mouse production of it is dragged out for way too long. It easily could have been 6 forty minute episodes instead of 8 hour long episodes. I like the whole backstory of Cross' wife being murdered (I don't remember if that was in the movies?), and he's just a great detective character, overall, but the whole side-plot with the stalking and attack on his family is unnecessary. Or it could have been the main plot for season 2. This just feels like there's too much going - this is a show that would benefit from simplicity. It's smart to update his story with the "defund police" movement - and show both sides of the coin. This could have been the side plot (a more in-depth look at how difficult it is to be a black police officer). I also think the main villain is a little too cartoonish (especially Ryan Eggold with that bleach blonde hair - there is no way I would trust a man with that hair). I'm not sure how I recognize the victim - played by Eloise Mumford because I searched her IMDB and the only thing I know her from is the 50 Shades movies, but I doubt I would recognize her from that. But the wig she wears in the beginning is God-awful. She's very strong in this role, though. I think I would have liked a little more of her story before the capture, too. But otherwise, I was entertained for most of this. I appreciate that Cross figures out the identity of the serial killer by episode 5 and then he's just struggling to prove it, but like I said, it just goes on for too long. I also knew that a certain character was untrustworthy from the second they are introduced - but I'm not sure why. I guess gut instinct, but it just was so obvious to me for the whole series so the finale is a bit of a letdown (aside from the climax fight song being "X Gon' Give it to Ya" by DMX). I will definitely watch, and probably enjoy, season two. 

3. St. Denis Medical - The first episode of this is a little rough around the edges, but it is significantly better by the second episode. And extremely funny so far. It's very similar to Parks & Recreation and The Office, but it's set in a hospital (like Scrubs if it were mockumentary style). The cast is very strong -Mama Goldberg and Allison Tolman!! Plus, David Allan Grier is a comedic legend - I remember watching him in In Living Color when I was a kid. He's the highlight here - in the second episode he has so many hilarious lines and he nails every single one of them. I think I'm only on the 5th episode, but there's been so many funny moments so far - like The Beastie Boys opening number with the doctor dancing to "Intergalactic" - I was crying laughing. And the doctor trying to find someone "good" to save to show how satisfying it is to be a life-saving doctor and the patient yells "Finally! A white doctor!" It's so fucking funny. I can't wait to watch more, but I have to wait for my husband to watch it with me (he will watch sitcoms with me - like real sitcoms, not shows that submit themselves as comedy for awards shows like The Bear). I think there is a big hole for sitcoms lately (Animal Control and Abbott Elementary are the only ones holding down the whole category), so I'm all in for this. And if it's already found it's footing in the first few episodes, hopefully it will be a long-running sitcom that will feel like a comfort show. I miss those. 

4. Interior Chinatown - Okay, so I watched this show because Chloe Bennet is in it - and I only really know her from the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D show and I have no real opinion of her from that. But she's dating my husband, Taron Egerton, so I have to support her. That man deserves to be happy - I've never read a bad thing about him (even his current co-star Jason Bateman praised him as "not being an asshole yet" and said something to effect that he doesn't have it in his bones - just pure kindness. The only thing I've ever seen of someone saying something bad about him is that one time a girl ran into him in the street and asked him for a picture and he said "no" and kept walking. Which is out of character for him, but also we can't expect celebrities to constantly be "On" every second of every day. I've also seen him be snippy when interviewers ask stupid questions or say something stupid - like when someone referred to his sisters as "half-sisters" and he corrected them "they are my sisters. period.". ANYWAY...I'm on a Taron tangent! It's been a long time! I just love him so much). I also like Jimmy O. Yang and Ronnie Chieng - they are both very funny. "I feel like I'm a background character in someone else's story" is the premise of the story. I'm not sure if I like it yet, though. It's very surreal - it's kind of reminiscent of that show with Jason Schwartzman where he's a private eye solving outrageous cases. Anyone remember that show?? It wasn't very good, but there was something interesting about it. Anyway, this kind of does the same outrageous scenarios thing, but it feels really cheesy; especially the "tv detectives". Nothing is grounded in reality. But I'm only 3 episodes in, so I'll still watch it and hope it finds its footing. There are definitely some funny parts ("I'll have the ginger chicken with no ginger" LOL. And when they are talking about Chloe and he goes "she's clearly Korean! Know your Asians!" I laughed. And then looked it up to see what her background is and she's not Korean. She's of Chinese descent on her dad's side and Caucasian American on her mom's side.). Also there's ANOTHER DMX song heard in this! I'M LIVING! 

5. The Day of the Jackal - Um, so I don't really understand all the great reviews for this. It's fine, I guess. It's very James Bond-coded, just with an assassin instead of a spy. And if you don't believe me just watch the opening credits, because I literally yelled out "are you fucking kidding me, with this James Bond song???". The opening scene of the series is really dumb, too, because we've all seen Mission: Impossible. Way to reference how unoriginal this series is within the first 10 minutes. I'm also not the biggest fan of Eddie Redmayne. I think he's been good in some stuff (The Theory of Everything), but he's not an Oscar-worthy actor (and yet he has one!!), and he over-acts. However, I appreciate that he takes on different/challenging roles in all different genres. He's following a different path than a lot of actors his age (I actually thought he was mid-30s until I just looked it up. He's my age!). I think he scales his acting back a little bit in this, and feels more human than I've seen him in a while, but I also think he's very boring in this role. And casting Lashana Lynch in this is really confusing, because she's IN the newer Bond films. I also don't care about any of the characters. I don't care if he gets away or dies. I don't care if she catches him and loses her family because she's so obsessed. They do nothing to make us care. I've just seen it all before - it's all playing out exactly how I expect it to and they've given nothing new to the spy/assassin genre. It's basically the same as Cross except that's actually entertaining. It's definitely another show that should have been 6 episodes maximum. I actually thought the 8th episode was the last one, but then I realized that the other 2 episodes just weren't released yet, and I feel like it's going to be a chore to finally finish this series. I will say that the music is fantastic (and I saw someone note that their music budget must be extraordinary because HOW did they get the rights to all these songs???).